t; possiable (openwebmail uses one) but it just hasn't been made yet ... or no
> one knows of one?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Freddie Cash
> Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2006 7:17
> To: ClamAV users ML
&
Joe Polk said:
> Paul Matthews wrote:
>
>>I seam to have started a rather indeepth argument, so from all that i
>> guess
>>i just have this to say.
>>
>>1. Stephen Gran, you mention a 'php library with clamav bindings' how
>> does
>>that help me? is that something i should be looking into in relati
Paul Matthews wrote:
I seam to have started a rather indeepth argument, so from all that i guess
i just have this to say.
1. Stephen Gran, you mention a 'php library with clamav bindings' how does
that help me? is that something i should be looking into in relation to a
squirriel mail plugin?
On Tue, Jan 10, 2006 at 12:17:54PM +1000, Paul Matthews said:
> I seam to have started a rather indeepth argument, so from all that i guess
> i just have this to say.
>
> 1. Stephen Gran, you mention a 'php library with clamav bindings' how does
> that help me? is that something i should be lookin
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Freddie Cash
Sent: Tuesday, 10 January 2006 7:17
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Squirriel Mail clamav scanner
On January 9, 2006 11:46 am, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > On January 9, 2006 11:0
On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 14:55 -0800, John W. Baxter wrote:
> On 1/9/06 11:18 AM, "John Jolet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Why bother attacking the others when the most damage is done by attacking
> the easy one? If market share shifts, the situation will change.
No, it doesn't really have much to
On 1/9/06 11:18 AM, "John Jolet" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I guess the point here (and I agree with it) is the concept of
> defense in depth. Even if my server is scanning, why shouldn't my
> client go ahead and scan? just think how hard viruses would have to
> work if EVERY process that touc
On January 9, 2006 11:46 am, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > On January 9, 2006 11:06 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > > just reject viruses at the front door, and you'll be fine.
> > > 'client-side' scanning (squirrelmail IS a client, even though it's
> > > run on a server) is not a 'feature'. Don't thin
Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
On Monday 09 January 2006 04:07, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:45:33PM +1000, Paul Matthews said:
hi there,
i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using ClamAV
to scan e-mails?
Not off hand, sorry. There is a php libr
>
> On January 9, 2006 11:06 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> > just reject viruses at the front door, and you'll be fine.
> > 'client-side' scanning (squirrelmail IS a client, even though it's run
> > on a server) is not a 'feature'. Don't think you should do it that way
> > just because thunderbird
On Jan 9, 2006, at 1:10 PM, Freddie Cash wrote:
On January 9, 2006 11:06 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
just reject viruses at the front door, and you'll be fine.
'client-side' scanning (squirrelmail IS a client, even though it's
run
on a server) is not a 'feature'. Don't think you should do it
On January 9, 2006 11:06 am, Jeremy Kitchen wrote:
> just reject viruses at the front door, and you'll be fine.
> 'client-side' scanning (squirrelmail IS a client, even though it's run
> on a server) is not a 'feature'. Don't think you should do it that way
> just because thunderbird does it. Th
On Monday 09 January 2006 04:07, Stephen Gran wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:45:33PM +1000, Paul Matthews said:
> > hi there,
> >
> > i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using ClamAV
> > to scan e-mails?
>
> Not off hand, sorry. There is a php library with clamav bindin
> There are modules to do imap from other servers, as well as pop...at
> the user, not server level. I can very easily see a use for clam
> scanning at the squirrelmail user level, just as you have the ability
> to do spamassassin scanning at the user level.
This is true.
_
On Jan 9, 2006, at 9:17 AM, Bit Fuzzy wrote:
i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using
ClamAV
to scan e-mails?
IMHO that would be over kill.
Incomming messages will be scaned via ClamAV as should messages
being sent.
(depending on configuration)
Squirrelmail does
> i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using ClamAV
> to scan e-mails?
IMHO that would be over kill.
Incomming messages will be scaned via ClamAV as should messages being sent.
(depending on configuration)
Squirrelmail does not change how mail is sent or received. It only p
Paul Matthews wrote:
well i was thinking it would be like the anti-virus that scans the
e-mails on arrival, such as thunderbird & avgfree or outlook & norton
anti-virus.
<<-- snip -->>
Squirrel mail is an html based client. If you protect using milter /
etc for sendmail everything should be
well i was thinking it would be like the anti-virus that scans the
e-mails on arrival, such as thunderbird & avgfree or outlook & norton
anti-virus.
On 9/1/2006, "Stephen Gran" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:45:33PM +1000, Paul Matthews said:
>>
>> hi there,
>>
>> i was
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 09:45:33PM +1000, Paul Matthews said:
>
> hi there,
>
> i was wondering if anyone knows of a squirriel mail plugin using ClamAV
> to scan e-mails?
Not off hand, sorry. There is a php library with clamav bindings, I
understand. It does occur to me that scanning after the
19 matches
Mail list logo
