Helmut Schneider wrote:
> Lynn Duerksen wrote:
>
>>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in
>>> the original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>>
>> I am experiencing similar problems on my OpenBSD 3.4 box and was
>> wondering if there has been any resolution on this is
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf
> Of Helmut Schneider
> Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 2:40 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] OpenBSD clamav Port (0.67-1) RAR Files
> INFECTED (Worm.Bag
Lynn Duerksen wrote:
>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in
>> the original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>
> I am experiencing similar problems on my OpenBSD 3.4 box and was
> wondering if there has been any resolution on this issue.
I'm using 3.4, too.
--
>
> Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
>
> > Helmut Schneider wrote:
> >
> >>> seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files
> >>> (e.g.
> >>> Bagle.N):
> >>
> >> To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but
> clamav does
> >> not recognize the virus within the archive (ma
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>> Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in the
>> original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
>>
> Aaah :)
>
> In that case,
> test the original mail (not just the attachments) on
> http://www.gietl.com/test-clamav/.
>
Helmut Schneider wrote:
Thats the point, if clamav would have detected the virus in the original mail I wouldn't have posted here... :)
Aaah :)
In that case,
test the original mail (not just the attachments) on
http://www.gietl.com/test-clamav/.
If it's not detected, submit it to
http://www
Fajar A. Nugraha wrote:
> Helmut Schneider wrote:
>
>>> seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files
>>> (e.g.
>>> Bagle.N):
>>
>> To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but clamav does
>> not recognize the virus within the archive (maybe a DB problem)...
>>
>
Helmut Schneider wrote:
seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files (e.g.
Bagle.N):
To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but clamav does not recognize the virus within the archive (maybe a DB problem)...
Sometimes the signatures were created using the
Helmut Schneider wrote:
> seems that the clamav Port (0.67-1) has problems with RAR Files (e.g.
> Bagle.N):
To avoid missunderstandings, I know the file is pwd, but clamav does not recognize the
virus within the archive (maybe a DB problem)...
Please do not feed my mailbox, Swen already got th
