RE: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Shayne Lebrun
>Ok, so you already have apache bound to port 80. How do you bind the >rsync server to port 80 as well? As a client, you're not running an rsync server, you're running an rsync client. Muskoka.com 115 Manitoba Street Bracebridge, Ontario P1L 2B6 (705)645-6097 Muskoka.com is pleased to announce

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Lionel Bouton
Krištof Petr said the following on 10/06/2003 04:00 PM: rsync server can run on port 80. Clients can use standard http proxy, so you need no additional setting. Petr Good, but in practice mirrors are usually hosted by systems already hosting different web sites, extranets and other mirrors. H

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Miguel Bettencourt Dias (Netopia)
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 15:00, Krištof Petr wrote: > Daniel J McDonald wrote: > > >On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 07:42, Krištof Petr wrote: > > > > > >>Lionel Bouton wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>>The problem is that on the servers' side (main site and mirrors) > >>>you'll have to set up rsync servers in

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 09:00, Krištof Petr wrote: > Daniel J McDonald wrote: > > >But this is only the beginning. You also have to set up new firewall > >rules - probably on the box itself and on the front-end firewall > >protecting the box. And you might have to add load-balancer rules. And > >

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Krištof Petr
Daniel J McDonald wrote: On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 07:42, Krištof Petr wrote: Lionel Bouton wrote: The problem is that on the servers' side (main site and mirrors) you'll have to set up rsync servers instead of http servers. As a mirror admin this won't be good news for me... rsync

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Daniel J McDonald
On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 07:42, Krištof Petr wrote: > Lionel Bouton wrote: > > > > > The problem is that on the servers' side (main site and mirrors) > > you'll have to set up rsync servers instead of http servers. As a > > mirror admin this won't be good news for me... > > > rsync server setup isn

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Krištof Petr
Lionel Bouton wrote: The popularity doesn't really matter on the client side, rsync is readily available for all Unices and quite easy to get for Cygwin. The problem is that on the servers' side (main site and mirrors) you'll have to set up rsync servers instead of http servers. As a mirror adm

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> Could you describe the cwd file more in depth Tomasz ? I'd like to be Documentation and support in clamav (CVS) will be available tomorrow. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL PROTECTED] (\/)\. http://www.konarski.edu.pl/~zolw \..._ I

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Lionel Bouton
Tomasz Kojm said the following on 10/06/2003 09:32 AM: What about climb down from trees and take some more modern protocol like rsync? ;-) Rsync is not as popular as http ;) I don't see problem here because usually the updates are very small (the main database is updated ocasionally. Best reg

Re: [Clamav-users] New db container

2003-10-06 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> What about climb down from trees and take some more modern > protocol like rsync? ;-) Rsync is not as popular as http ;) I don't see problem here because usually the updates are very small (the main database is updated ocasionally. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo. [EMAIL P