RE: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned

2003-06-27 Thread Salvador Aguilar Huerta
MAIL PROTECTED] > -Mensaje original- > De: _Chris McKeever_ [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Enviado el: Viernes, 27 de Junio de 2003 10:18 a.m. > Para: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Asunto: RE: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned > > > Looks like it is catchi

Re: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned

2003-06-27 Thread Nicholas Chua
> Looks like it is catching it today! > Thanks If you like, sign up [EMAIL PROTECTED] maillist. Whenever a new sig is added, you will be informed. - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [E

RE: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned

2003-06-27 Thread _Chris McKeever_
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 9:45 AM > To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' > Subject: Re: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned > > > On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, _Chris McKeever_ wrote: > > > Is there a way I can check that clam is scanning zips alright? > > In the t

Re: [clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned

2003-06-27 Thread Jeffrey Goldberg
On Fri, 27 Jun 2003, _Chris McKeever_ wrote: > Is there a way I can check that clam is scanning zips alright? In the test directory in the distribution there is a file called test1. Try zipping that and mailing it through your system. When I do that clamav does catch it. > maybe this one (Sobig

[clamav-users] zip files nto being scanned

2003-06-27 Thread _Chris McKeever_
I think the below is slipping by my clam/qmail scan. It comes in a zip file. Is there a way I can check that clam is scanning zips alright? maybe this one isnt supported by clam yet? NAV output: Sender of the infected attachment: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Recipient of the infected attachment: Michael