Quite right. The next self-check did complete without a problem. Thanks
so much for your help.
David
--On Monday, October 24, 2011 4:57 PM +0300 Török Edwin
wrote:
On 2011-10-24 16:48, David Alix wrote:
Unfortunately, it may not be fixed on Solaris 9. My earlier problem
went away with
On 2011-10-24 16:48, David Alix wrote:
> Unfortunately, it may not be fixed on Solaris 9. My earlier problem went
> away with the update to daily.cld 13840. This different problem began
> yesterday with the update to daily.cld 13842.
>
> This is the update I saw in freshclam.log:
> Received si
Unfortunately, it may not be fixed on Solaris 9. My earlier problem went
away with the update to daily.cld 13840. This different problem began
yesterday with the update to daily.cld 13842.
This is the update I saw in freshclam.log:
Received signal: wake up
ClamAV update process started at Mon
Matthew Slowe wrote:
On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:53, Matthew Slowe wrote:
On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:48, Pierre Dehaen wrote:
It looks good ! clamdscan --reload gives:
Mon Oct 24 14:47:42 2011 -> Reading databases from /opt/clamav/share/clamav
Mon Oct 24 14:48:04 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (115
Hello Edwin
On 24.10.2011 14:23, Török Edwin wrote:
152 is out which should include the fix for this crash on Sparc.
Once it reaches your mirrors and freshclam confirms that you got bytecode.cvd
152 can you test again to
see if it fixed the crash for you?
* bytecode has been updated a few min
On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:53, Matthew Slowe wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:48, Pierre Dehaen wrote:
>>
>> It looks good ! clamdscan --reload gives:
>> Mon Oct 24 14:47:42 2011 -> Reading databases from /opt/clamav/share/clamav
>> Mon Oct 24 14:48:04 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (1159407 signa
On 24 Oct 2011, at 13:48, Pierre Dehaen wrote:
>
> It looks good ! clamdscan --reload gives:
> Mon Oct 24 14:47:42 2011 -> Reading databases from /opt/clamav/share/clamav
> Mon Oct 24 14:48:04 2011 -> Database correctly reloaded (1159407 signatures)
>
> Thank you Edwin !
Forced --reload works f
On 24 Oct 2011 at 15:44, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2011-10-24 15:40, Pierre Dehaen wrote:
> > On 24 Oct 2011 at 15:23, Török Edwin wrote:
> >
> >> On 2011-10-24 15:03, Török Edwin wrote:
> >>> On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
> Hello all
>
> On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slo
On 2011-10-24 15:40, Pierre Dehaen wrote:
> On 24 Oct 2011 at 15:23, Török Edwin wrote:
>
>> On 2011-10-24 15:03, Török Edwin wrote:
>>> On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
Hello all
On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
> I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10
On 24 Oct 2011 at 15:23, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2011-10-24 15:03, Török Edwin wrote:
> > On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
> >> Hello all
> >>
> >> On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
> >>> I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running
> >>> 0.97.x since abou
Török Edwin wrote:
On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
Hello all
On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
since about 00:55 BST this morning.
Just wanted to confirm what Matthew sees.
* Also on Solaris 10 SPA
On 2011-10-24 15:03, Török Edwin wrote:
> On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
>> Hello all
>>
>> On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
>>> I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
>>> since about 00:55 BST this morning.
>>
>> Just wanted to confirm what
Same problem here.
--
Bryan Hodgson Lehigh University
bryan.hodg...@lehigh.eduPackard Lab 019 room 115
610-758-500119 Memorial Drive West
Bethlehem, PA 18015-3016
__
On 2011-10-24 14:55, Matthias Egger wrote:
> Hello all
>
> On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
>> I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
>> since about 00:55 BST this morning.
>
> Just wanted to confirm what Matthew sees.
>
> * Also on Solaris 10 SPARC
Hello all
On 24.10.2011 12:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
since about 00:55 BST this morning.
Just wanted to confirm what Matthew sees.
* Also on Solaris 10 SPARC Machines
* Same Error since 01:52 MEST this Morning (which s
On 24 Oct 2011, at 11:13, Matthew Slowe wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
> since about 00:55 BST this morning. Our 0.96 hosts seem to be ok (and I've
> downgraded the important 0.97 ones so that clamd can run...).
>
> The following err
Hi,
I'm seeing a problem on a bunch of Solaris 10 SPARC servers running 0.97.x
since about 00:55 BST this morning. Our 0.96 hosts seem to be ok (and I've
downgraded the important 0.97 ones so that clamd can run...).
The following error occurs $SELF_CHECK_INTERVAL (600s) after clamd start:
Mon
17 matches
Mail list logo
