On 25 Jun 2012 at 9:55, Tom Judge wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On 24/06/2012 18:15, Paul Whelan wrote:
> > What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows
> > binaries?
> >
>
> The windows binaries where packaged with custom shell script before,
> now they are packaged by VisualStudi
> VisualStudio does not have a target to build a ZIP file, we could also
> build a cab file if this would help.
>
Hi Tom,
Any use?
http://markkemper1.blogspot.co.uk/2010/10/zipping-build-outputs-using-build-file.html
http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4794503/is-there-a-zip-project-in-visual-st
On 06/25/2012 05:26 PM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 25/06/2012 10:10, aCaB wrote:
>> FYI unrar license is incompatible with the GPL. That was the
>> rationale in the packaging.
>
>
> Yes that is why they are separate binaries. As far as we can tell
> there is nothing that states that you can't put th
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/2012 10:10, aCaB wrote:
> On 06/25/12 15:55, Tom Judge wrote:
>>> Exclusion of the necessary msvc* runtime libraries
>>
>> The inclusion of them helps lower the barrier to entry for
>> people to try ClamAV on windows.
>
> So why have you rem
On 06/25/12 15:55, Tom Judge wrote:
>> Exclusion of the necessary msvc* runtime libraries
>
> The inclusion of them helps lower the barrier to entry for people to
> try ClamAV on windows.
So why have you removed them?
>> Inclusion of the previously separate libclamunrar libs
>
> There is no rea
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 25/06/2012 04:34, Steve Basford wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:13:58AM +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
>>> While I can see the MSI installer being useful to some
>>> people... I'd prefer to have the .ZIPs back (or have both
>>> built), as I've
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Paul,
On 24/06/2012 18:15, Paul Whelan wrote:
> What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows
> binaries?
>
The windows binaries where packaged with custom shell script before,
now they are packaged by VisualStudio when we bui
> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:13:58AM +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
>> While I can see the MSI installer being useful to some people... I'd
>> prefer to have the .ZIPs back (or have both built), as I've got to run
>> the
>> MSI
>> installer, find where the files have been installed and them copy them
On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 08:13:58AM +0100, Steve Basford wrote:
> While I can see the MSI installer being useful to some people... I'd
> prefer to have the .ZIPs back (or have both built), as I've got to run the
> MSI
> installer, find where the files have been installed and them copy them out,
> so
> Your best bet is to ask on the ClamWin forum. Here is the forum site
> http://forums.clamwin.com/
I'm not sure if he's talking about the binaries here, auto-built by
ClamAV Team (not the version by the ClamWin team)
http://sourceforge.net/projects/clamav/files/clamav/win32/
The builds used to
On 06/24/2012 03:15 PM, Paul Whelan wrote:
What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows binaries?
The differences include:
Creation of a msi install in place of the previously zipped executables and
libraries
Exclusion of the necessary msvc* runtime libraries
Inclusion of
What's the reason for the change in the packaging of the windows binaries?
The differences include:
Creation of a msi install in place of the previously zipped executables and
libraries
Exclusion of the necessary msvc* runtime libraries
Inclusion of the previously separate libclamunrar libs
12 matches
Mail list logo
