Re: [clamav-users] Problem with new safebrowsing file

2019-03-06 Thread Chris Pollock via clamav-users
On Wed, 2019-03-06 at 17:55 -0500, Maarten Broekman via clamav-users wrote: > I have 48472 and 48473. The 48474 I got was the gdb file that was > downloaded as part of the cdiff. The freshclam process hung after > downloading though. The order of the 48474 gdb file was no different > from the orde

Re: [clamav-users] Problem with new safebrowsing file

2019-03-06 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
I have 48472 and 48473. The 48474 I got was the gdb file that was downloaded as part of the cdiff. The freshclam process hung after downloading though. The order of the 48474 gdb file was no different from the order of the 48473 file. Freshclam gets this far before hanging after the download. The

Re: [clamav-users] Problem with new safebrowsing file

2019-03-06 Thread David Raynor
That's strange, the 48474 I have should have the sorting changed and has the improved loading time we're talking about. $ sigtool --info safebrowsing.cvd File: safebrowsing.cvd Build time: 06 Mar 2019 13:24 -0500 Version: 48474 Signatures: 3232286 Functionality level: 63 Builder: google MD5: 70c61

[clamav-users] Problem with new safebrowsing file

2019-03-06 Thread Maarten Broekman via clamav-users
The new safebrowsing cvd (starting with version 48473) seems to be sorted in a way that increases the load time of that file by several orders of magnitude. I have a previous version from February where the entries in the gdb section are sorted like this: S2:F:917787cff7b0993917209809ff3d94be