On Thursday 15 October 2015 12:19:19 Peter Bonivart wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Gene Heskett
wrote:
> >> http://sanesecurity.co.uk/foxhole-databases/
> >
> > Unfortunatly, nothing seems to be linked, the only thing I can save
> > is the web page itself with either iceweasel or chro
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 5:55 PM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>> http://sanesecurity.co.uk/foxhole-databases/
>
> Unfortunatly, nothing seems to be linked, the only thing I can save is
> the web page itself with either iceweasel or chromium. And I did enable
> cookies, in chromium, to no avail.
That's ju
Gene Heskett skrev den 2015-10-15 17:32:
Amanda will have them yet for about 29 more days. But they are very
very
old, with lots newer versions readily downloadable.
so amanda is not usefull here
Can freshclam be used to keep it up to date? If so, how?
yes, but in case dns is spoffed yo
On Thursday 15 October 2015 11:22:21 Steve Basford wrote:
> http://sanesecurity.co.uk/foxhole-databases/
Unfortunatly, nothing seems to be linked, the only thing I can save is
the web page itself with either iceweasel or chromium. And I did enable
cookies, in chromium, to no avail.
I am also
Gene Heskett skrev den 2015-10-15 17:27:
Ok, but how do I keep clamscan from using it, when its clamdscan,
scanning the incoming mail via this recipe in my .procmailrc
add --official-db-only=yes to clamscan or for clamdscan search for this
option in clamd.conf
more info in man clamscan
VI
On Thursday 15 October 2015 11:15:54 Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On October 15, 2015 5:04:36 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > So they will be gone from tomoorows scan report.
>
> no backup ?
Amanda will have them yet for about 29 more days. But they are very very
old, with lots newer versions readily do
On Thursday 15 October 2015 11:15:54 Benny Pedersen wrote:
> On October 15, 2015 5:04:36 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
> > So they will be gone from tomoorows scan report.
>
> no backup ?
>
> > Clamav user list, comments please?
>
> foxhole is 0day signatures, so you find files that match it in
> localh
Yes, please try not to bring up any more UNOFFICIAL database issues here.
-Al-
On Thu, Oct 15, 2015 at 08:03 AM, Gene Heskett wrote:
>
> Clamav user list, comments please?
> Cheers, Gene Heskett
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_
On Thu, October 15, 2015 4:03 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings everybody;
>
>
> I added a new, not quite official database to my clamav checker, and this
> morning its fussing about several files I have on my web page:
> /var/www/html/gene/Genes-os9-stf/dw4_beta_1.4.tar.gz:
> Sanesecurity.Foxh
Hi,
When you have "UNOFFICIAL" in the Clamav findings, means that a signature
was created with a sigtool either for md5 or hex-dump and added manually in
the .hdb or .ndb files.
I strongly encourage you not to use any database you dont know, because
the signatures may be written for a purpouse
On Thu, October 15, 2015 4:03 pm, Gene Heskett wrote:
> Greetings everybody;
>
>
> I added a new, not quite official database to my clamav checker, and this
> morning its fussing about several files I have on my web page:
> /var/www/html/gene/Genes-os9-stf/dw4_beta_1.4.tar.gz:
> Sanesecurity.Foxh
On October 15, 2015 5:04:36 PM Gene Heskett wrote:
So they will be gone from tomoorows scan report.
no backup ?
Clamav user list, comments please?
foxhole is 0day signatures, so you find files that match it in localhost
does not mean its virus
___
Greetings everybody;
I added a new, not quite official database to my clamav checker, and this
morning its fussing about several files I have on my web page:
/var/www/html/gene/Genes-os9-stf/dw4_beta_1.4.tar.gz:
Sanesecurity.Foxhole.Zip.UNOFFICIAL FOUND
/var/www/html/gene/Genes-os9-stf/print4dw.
13 matches
Mail list logo
