On 10/01/2012 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/2012 9:24 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
On 9/30/12 12:43 PM, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:54:38 +0800, Michael Wu
wrote:
We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from
" http://
On 10/1/2012 11:18 AM, Shawn Webb wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>> This makes getting source code unnecessarily complicated; lots of
>> folks do not use a browser on their production server. Please
>> remove the offending web code immediately.
>
> I'm a little confu
On Oct 1, 2012, at 1:36 PM, Jerry wrote:
> Maybe it is just me; however, I have no idea if this poster is pro or
> con the statements he is responding to.
It doesn't matter.
Let's bring it back on topic (not a bash on you Jerry), where is the OS
specific redirection taking place? If Sourcefor
On Mon, 01 Oct 2012 18:17:57 +0200
Benny Pedersen articulated:
> Marcel Blenkers skrev den 01-10-2012 18:01:
>
> > Maybe i am stupid, but i need linux-sources and using (sometimes)
> > Windows-Desktops. I think it is a pain in the ass to get software
> > automatically as the programmer does not k
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
> This makes getting source code unnecessarily complicated; lots of
> folks do not use a browser on their production server. Please
> remove the offending web code immediately.
I'm a little confused. From what page would you like the browser
det
Marcel Blenkers skrev den 01-10-2012 18:01:
Maybe i am stupid, but i need linux-sources and using (sometimes)
Windows-Desktops. I think it is a pain in the ass to get software
automatically as the programmer does not know what i need and want.
and i should agre ?
And, please forgive me, a us
Am 01.10.2012 17:56, schrieb Benny Pedersen:
> Mike Grau skrev den 01-10-2012 17:45:
>
>> I mean that I also agree that the stupid web code ought to be removed.
>
> and its not helpfull to let users get the exact needed binaries for
> windows ?, well i have seen more example on getting 32bit exe
Mike Grau skrev den 01-10-2012 17:45:
I mean that I also agree that the stupid web code ought to be
removed.
and its not helpfull to let users get the exact needed binaries for
windows ?, well i have seen more example on getting 32bit exe files for
an 64bit host :(
and bing desktop is stil
Fredrich Maney skrev den 01-10-2012 17:39:
why are users so damm stupid ? :)
Why are developers so damn arrogant?
i am just a luser trying ot collect 1000 phish signatures :)
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav
Benny Pedersen wrote:
> Mike Grau skrev den 01-10-2012 16:53:
>
>> +1
I mean that I also agree that the stupid web code ought to be removed.
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
On Mon, Oct 1, 2012 at 11:26 AM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
>
> why are users so damm stupid ? :)
>
Why are developers so damn arrogant?
fpsm
--
Fredrich Maney
+1.502.509.2594 google
fredrichma...@gmail.com
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: v
Mike Grau skrev den 01-10-2012 16:53:
+1
and the point is ?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki.clamav.net
http://www.clamav.net/support/ml
Noel Jones skrev den 01-10-2012 16:33:
This makes getting source code unnecessarily complicated; lots of
folks do not use a browser on their production server. Please
remove the offending web code immediately.
cant wget fake browsers ?, in gentoo its just:
emerge --fetchonly clamav
why are
Rick Macdougall wrote:
> On 01/10/2012 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
>>> This is correct. The link takes you to the latest release for
>>> your detected platform. I'm guessing that you are using a 64bit
>>> windows machine to do the download?
>>>
>>> Tom
>>
>> This makes getting source code unnecess
On 01/10/2012 10:33 AM, Noel Jones wrote:
This is correct. The link takes you to the latest release for
your detected platform. I'm guessing that you are using a 64bit
windows machine to do the download?
Tom
This makes getting source code unnecessarily complicated; lots of
folks do not use a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 10/1/2012 9:24 AM, Tom Judge wrote:
> On 9/30/12 12:43 PM, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
>> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:54:38 +0800, Michael Wu
>> wrote:
>
>>> We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from
>>> " http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/downl
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 9/30/12 12:43 PM, Jesper Dybdal wrote:
> On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:54:38 +0800, Michael Wu
> wrote:
>
>> We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from "
>> http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ ", but only get
>> the downloa
On Wed, 19 Sep 2012 08:54:38 +0800, Michael Wu
wrote:
>We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from "
>http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ ", but only get the
>download "Setup-x64.msi". Please help to check where we can download the
>tar.gz source code. Thank you.
T
On 9/18/12 5:54 PM, "Michael Wu" wrote:
> We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from "
> http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ ", but only get the
> download "Setup-x64.msi". Please help to check where we can download the
> tar.gz source code.
>
I'm not having any probl
Dear all,
We try to download ClamAV 0.97.6 official source code from "
http://www.clamav.net/lang/en/download/sources/ ", but only get the
download "Setup-x64.msi". Please help to check where we can download the
tar.gz source code. Thank you.
Regards,
20 matches
Mail list logo
