On Mon, Nov 19, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Erwan David wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen said:
>> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>>
>> >This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> >daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
>> >do the
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 09:38:30PM CET, Benny Pedersen said:
> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>
> >This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
> >daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
> >do the same?
>
> if you like to see redhat performs as badly as de
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>
>
>> This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
>> do the same?
>
>
> if you like to see redhat performs as badly as debian
On Sat, Nov 17, 2012 at 4:38 PM, Benny Pedersen wrote:
> francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
>
>
>> This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
>> daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
>> do the same?
>
>
> if you like to see redhat performs as badly as debian
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 21:14:
This appears to be what the Debian system does when the freshclam
daemon handles things. Should my Redhat cron
do the same?
if you like to see redhat performs as badly as debian yes
stop using cron to get clamav updated, stop using anything that is
francis picabia skrev den 16-11-2012 19:56:
Here is the daily cron I have on Redhat
#!/bin/sh
maybe start configure freshclam.conf and then start freshclam daemond
would solve it without any redhats cron scripting that unpacks cvd files
?
no cvd ?
what happend if just issue freshclam as r
On Fri, Nov 16, 2012 at 2:56 PM, francis picabia wrote:
> I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
>
> I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
> postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
>
> Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, using the scamp script
I have a primary MX running Redhat, with postfix+amavisd+clamav
I also have a secondary MX and SMTP gateway running Debian, with
postfix+amavisd-new+clamav
Recently we adopted use of Sanesecurity additions, using the scamp script
on both MX and SMTP.
Root receives virus notifications on the SMTP
