Re: [clamav-users] Deprecation of "Basic signature format"

2012-06-15 Thread Török Edwin
On 06/14/2012 08:29 PM, Matt Olney wrote: > Nathan, > > There are no current plans to remove support for that signature format. > However, you should investigate the alternate formats in case that changes > in a future version of ClamAV. In particular look at the .hdb format that > matches both

Re: [clamav-users] Deprecation of "Basic signature format"

2012-06-15 Thread Török Edwin
On 06/14/2012 08:29 PM, Matt Olney wrote: > Nathan, > > There are no current plans to remove support for that signature format. > However, you should investigate the alternate formats in case that changes > in a future version of ClamAV. In particular look at the .hdb format that > matches both

Re: [clamav-users] Deprecation of "Basic signature format"

2012-06-15 Thread Török Edwin
On 06/14/2012 08:29 PM, Matt Olney wrote: > Nathan, > > There are no current plans to remove support for that signature format. > However, you should investigate the alternate formats in case that changes > in a future version of ClamAV. In particular look at the .hdb format that > matches both

Re: [clamav-users] Deprecation of "Basic signature format"

2012-06-14 Thread Matt Olney
Nathan, There are no current plans to remove support for that signature format. However, you should investigate the alternate formats in case that changes in a future version of ClamAV. In particular look at the .hdb format that matches both size and MD5. Matt On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 12:29 PM,

[clamav-users] Deprecation of "Basic signature format"

2012-06-13 Thread ng seclists
Folks, I see that in the signatures documentation that "Basic signature format" is now deprecated. Using Clam 0.97.4, this .db format is still working. Will support for this format ever be dropped or can I continue to create signatures using this format indefinitely without consequence? Thanks!