Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads?

2004-08-04 Thread Laurent Wacrenier
Le Mar 3 aoû 11:15:39 2004, Xavier Beaudouin écrit: > Humm ... What about using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and set in /etc/make.conf : > > PTHREAD_CFLAGS?= > PTHREAD_LIBS?=-lkse On FreeBSD 5, you may able to swap on the fly to your favorite thread library editing /etc/libmap.conf. See libmap.conf(5) for det

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads?

2004-08-03 Thread Robert Blayzor
Xavier Beaudouin wrote: Humm ... What about using FreeBSD 5.2.1 and set in /etc/make.conf : PTHREAD_CFLAGS?= PTHREAD_LIBS?=-lkse ... Works like a charm for me Because 5.2.1 is not intended for production servers and is still considered a technology release. -- Robert Blayzor, BOFH INOC, LLC [

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads?

2004-08-03 Thread Xavier Beaudouin
If nobody has negative experiences, I will probably give this a spin and report back to the list if there is interest. I think the biggest problem is not the default threads in FreeBSD 4.x, I believe that a lot of problems with threads is the FreeBSD 4.x libc_r functions, which most of them are

Re: [Clamav-users] clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads?

2004-08-02 Thread Robert Blayzor
Jan Pieter Cornet wrote: I wonder if anyone here tried compiling clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads installed? Does that work as expected? At least configure for clamav-0.75-1 does not try to detect liblthread, but it is of course easy to install linuxthreads in such a way that clamav will pick it

[Clamav-users] clamd on FreeBSD with linuxthreads?

2004-08-02 Thread Jan Pieter Cornet
We recently discovered that on FreeBSD (4.10), clamd isn't really multi- threaded, as the default FreeBSD pthread is userland threads only, which blocks on disk access. As a result, we had occasional long delays when scanning multiple mails at the same time. I wonder if anyone here tried compiling

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-05-01 Thread ODHIAMBO Washington
* Fajar Arief Nugraha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030501 05:38]: wrote: Maybe a *BSD problem. > NO ... > > What is the problem anyway? Memory leak? Crash? > > I've been using it for 3 days now on Solaris and it seems to work fine. > MUCH better than the previous or stable snapshot :( > > OD

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-05-01 Thread Fajar Arief Nugraha
NO ... What is the problem anyway? Memory leak? Crash? I've been using it for 3 days now on Solaris and it seems to work fine. MUCH better than the previous or stable snapshot :( ODHIAMBO Washington wrote: * Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030430 17:39]: wrote: Hi!

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-04-30 Thread ODHIAMBO Washington
* Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030430 17:39]: wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Just tested the latest snapshot of ClamAV, clamd seems completely dead. > > Nothing happens when I run clamdscan. Is Clamd under FreeBSD just > > working worse and worse? > > Please don't use clamav-20030424, it seems to

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-04-30 Thread ODHIAMBO Washington
* Daniel Wiberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20030430 15:43]: wrote: > Hi! > > Just tested the latest snapshot of ClamAV, clamd seems completely dead. > Nothing happens when I run clamdscan. Is Clamd under FreeBSD just > working worse and worse? True;-) Go back to the previous snapshot!!! It's much b

Re: [clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-04-30 Thread Tomasz Kojm
> Hi! > > Just tested the latest snapshot of ClamAV, clamd seems completely dead. > Nothing happens when I run clamdscan. Is Clamd under FreeBSD just > working worse and worse? Please don't use clamav-20030424, it seems to be seriously broken. Best regards, Tomasz Kojm -- oo.

[clamav-users] Clamd on FreeBSD

2003-04-30 Thread Daniel Wiberg
Hi! Just tested the latest snapshot of ClamAV, clamd seems completely dead. Nothing happens when I run clamdscan. Is Clamd under FreeBSD just working worse and worse? -- Daniel Wiberg www.wiberg.nu - To unsubscribe, e-mail: [