>
> 2. I am using my 0.71 versions of clamav.conf and freschclam.conf. What am
> I going to lose by doing this?
>
> In the mean time, I'll go read the 0.75.1 conf files and see what I can
> pick out.
>
No differences in freshclam.conf, but clamav.conf had one change. Added it
and up and running.
> On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon
>> after.
>
> The current version 0.75.1 . 0.71 will NOT catch all current viruses so
> you
> should upgrade first.
Okay, upgrade complete. It took all of 25 minutes, includin
On Fri, 3 Sep 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon
> after.
The current version 0.75.1 . 0.71 will NOT catch all current viruses so you
should upgrade first.
> I'm curious what happened to %f for send_sms to pass the location of
I installed clamav a few months ago, then upgraded to version 0.71 soon
after.
I'm curious what happened to %f for send_sms to pass the location of the
file that is infected. Only the %v parameter is passed now. I would rather
know where a virus is than the name of the virus, if I have to choose.
