Re: [Clamav-users] old milter with 0.95 / test with 0.95 milter gave can't read SMFIC_BODYEOB reply packet header

aCaB schrieb: > Robert Schetterer wrote: >> Hi,i noticed i have to update to 0.95 by security issuses >> but i dont wanna change milters on many mailsservers if not needed. >> Is there a chance using old clamav-milter setups ( i. with commandline >> options ) and clamd 0.95. ( guess i read so in th

Re: [Clamav-users] old milter with 0.95

Robert Schetterer wrote: > Hi,i noticed i have to update to 0.95 by security issuses > but i dont wanna change milters on many mailsservers if not needed. > Is there a chance using old clamav-milter setups ( i. with commandline > options ) and clamd 0.95. ( guess i read so in the list ) > If yes ar

[Clamav-users] old milter with 0.95

Hi,i noticed i have to update to 0.95 by security issuses but i dont wanna change milters on many mailsservers if not needed. Is there a chance using old clamav-milter setups ( i. with commandline options ) and clamd 0.95. ( guess i read so in the list ) If yes are there any online faqs about it?