Dennis Davis wrote:
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
From: Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ClamAV users ML
Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:18:30 -0800
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
...
if [ -f "$RunFlag" ]; then
e
On Tue, 6 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> From: Dennis Peterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Date: Tue, 06 Mar 2007 11:18:30 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
> Reply-To: ClamAV users ML
...
> if [ -f "$RunFlag" ];
Bill Landry wrote:
Dennis Peterson wrote the following on 3/6/2007 11:18 AM -0800:
Here is my latest script iteration, which now includes testing for
newer files before copying the file to the temp working directory
for testing, and when copying is done due to a newer file being
found, the or
Dennis Peterson wrote the following on 3/6/2007 11:18 AM -0800:
Here is my latest script iteration, which now includes testing for
newer files before copying the file to the temp working directory
for testing, and when copying is done due to a newer file being
found, the original timestamps w
Dennis Peterson wrote:
There are two test files that list the files to download. The
file names and contents are:
file.list
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/phish.ndb.gz
http://www.sanesecurity.com/clamav/scam.ndb.gz
msrbl.list
MSRBL-Images.hdb
MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
Just remembered one other file
:39:58 -0800
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
...
# Check for MSRBL IMAGE database update
rsync -a rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb \
$rsync_dir/MSRBL-Images.ndb
cp $rsync_dir/MSRBL-Images.ndb $tmp_dir
Shouldn't that read "MSRB
ct: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
...
# Check for MSRBL IMAGE database update
rsync -a rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb \
$rsync_dir/MSRBL-Images.ndb
cp $rsync_dir/MSRBL-Images.ndb $tmp_dir
Shouldn't that read "MSRBL-Images.hdb"
Dennis Davis wrote the following on 3/6/2007 6:14 AM -0800:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Bill Landry wrote:
From: Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: ClamAV users ML ,
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:39:58 -0800
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
...
#
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Bill Landry wrote:
> From: Bill Landry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: ClamAV users ML ,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 05 Mar 2007 23:39:58 -0800
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] msrbl sigs: rsync
...
> # Check for MSRBL IMAGE database
Steve Basford wrote the following on 3/4/2007 10:46 PM -0800:
> Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
>> My guess is the MSRBL folks would like it if you downloaded the new
>> files only if the file has been modified.
>>
>>
> I think you're right... the size of their images .ndb file
> (un-compressed) j
Christopher X. Candreva wrote:
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB directory
to insure an atomic operation. If clamd/clamav-milter should happen to
reload with a half-copied file in the DB dir, it will likely stop running
On Mon, 5 Mar 2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB directory
> > to insure an atomic operation. If clamd/clamav-milter should happen to
> > reload with a half-copied file in the DB dir, it will likely stop running.
>
> Yah - I realize
Noel Jones wrote:
At 09:35 AM 3/5/2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
The mv -f ... statement should be a cp ... statement. That will leave
the msrbl files in the directory that rsync uses for downloading and
for comparing versions.
It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB
At 09:35 AM 3/5/2007, Dennis Peterson wrote:
The mv -f ... statement should be a cp ... statement. That will
leave the msrbl files in the directory that rsync uses for
downloading and for comparing versions.
It makes a great deal of sense to move the files into the clam DB
directory to insur
Dennis Peterson wrote:
If you use wget rather than curl you can grab both of Steve's files in
one connection rather than two. I'll submit my script to Steve when I
get caught up on things here. It pulls down Sanesecurity and MSRBL files.
I just recalled that curl allows this too with multip
Chris wrote:
On Monday 05 March 2007 12:08 am, Dennis Peterson wrote:
I ran it twice and both times it downloaded a new .hdb and .ndb file at
least the 'modified' times were within a couple of minutes of the current
time. I've commented out the
I just now realized you're moving the downloaded
On Monday 05 March 2007 12:08 am, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> > I ran it twice and both times it downloaded a new .hdb and .ndb file at
> > least the 'modified' times were within a couple of minutes of the current
> > time. I've commented out the
>
> I just now realized you're moving the downloaded f
Dennis Peterson wrote:
>
> My guess is the MSRBL folks would like it if you downloaded the new
> files only if the file has been modified.
>
I think you're right... the size of their images .ndb file
(un-compressed) jumped to about 7.5 meg in size and I guess shifting
that amount of data for x us
Chris wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2007 4:15 pm, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Steve, since I'm using a script that was posted here quite some time ago
what changes need to be made:
Create a text file, msrbl.list, with these two lines:
MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
MSRBL-Images.hdb
Run rsync and call that file, and t
Chris wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2007 4:15 pm, Dennis Peterson wrote:
Steve, since I'm using a script that was posted here quite some time ago
what changes need to be made:
Create a text file, msrbl.list, with these two lines:
MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
MSRBL-Images.hdb
Run rsync and call that file, and t
On Sunday 04 March 2007 4:15 pm, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> >
> > Steve, since I'm using a script that was posted here quite some time ago
> > what changes need to be made:
>
> Create a text file, msrbl.list, with these two lines:
> MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
> MSRBL-Images.hdb
>
> Run rsync and call that file,
Chris wrote:
On Sunday 04 March 2007 7:23 am, Steve Basford wrote:
Hi,
Just a heads up for those using the msrbl sigs.
As of last week:
"Downloading of the signature files is currently only available via rsync":
rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
/path/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb r
On Sunday 04 March 2007 7:23 am, Steve Basford wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just a heads up for those using the msrbl sigs.
>
> As of last week:
>
> "Downloading of the signature files is currently only available via rsync":
>
> rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
> /path/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb r
Hi,
Just a heads up for those using the msrbl sigs.
As of last week:
"Downloading of the signature files is currently only available via rsync":
rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb /path/MSRBL-SPAM.ndb
rsync rsync://rsync.mirror.msrbl.com/msrbl/MSRBL-Images.hdb
/path/MSRB
24 matches
Mail list logo
