Hi Nigel-
On Aug 28, 2006, at 6:42 AM, Nigel Horne wrote:
Repeating advice already given here: the engine in 0.88 is *old*.
If performance is
an issue upgrade to the code in CVS.
Thanks for your response. We'll definitely look at doing that.
Just to confirm: you would expect clamd processe
On 8/28/06, Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Repeating advice already given here: the engine in 0.88 is *old*. If
performance is
an issue upgrade to the code in CVS.
How long before the current CVS code base becomes the "stable" release?
Jeff D
___
David Blank-Edelman wrote:
Howdy-
We've recently been seeing our clamd processes run very hot (spiking
up to 85% of the CPU as reported by prtstat and top) on two different
Solaris 9 boxes. For example, here's a few lines from prtstat -L
(showing the two clamav threads who are together eating
Howdy-
We've recently been seeing our clamd processes run very hot (spiking
up to 85% of the CPU as reported by prtstat and top) on two different
Solaris 9 boxes. For example, here's a few lines from prtstat -L
(showing the two clamav threads who are together eating 66% of the
CPU) .
PI
