Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam and new virus bases

2004-03-03 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Trog wrote: [cut] Question: In what way does the arguments supplied to the configuration option NotifyClamd (i.e. "/etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd reload") relate to the specification of the argument to the configuration option NofityClamd (i.e. /optional/config/file/path). Answer: They don't. something

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam and new virus bases

2004-03-03 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:57, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > Trog wrote: > > On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:29, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > > > > > >>#NotifyClamd [/optional/config/file/path] > >>NotifyClamd /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd reload > > > > > > Whats this rubbish? > > ---

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam and new virus bases

2004-03-03 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
Trog wrote: On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:29, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: #NotifyClamd [/optional/config/file/path] NotifyClamd /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd reload Whats this rubbish? ------ ? Isn't this needed? Clamd knows about new bases from freshclam anyway? -- Andrzej

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam and new virus bases

2004-03-03 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2004-03-03 at 11:29, Andrzej Zawadzki wrote: > #NotifyClamd [/optional/config/file/path] > NotifyClamd /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd reload Whats this rubbish? ------ -trog signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part

[Clamav-users] freshclam and new virus bases

2004-03-03 Thread Andrzej Zawadzki
[EMAIL PROTECTED] etc]# freshclam ClamAV update process started at Wed Mar 3 11:56:30 2004 Reading CVD header (main.cvd): OK main.cvd is up to date (version: 21, sigs: 20094, f-level: 1, builder: tkojm) Reading CVD header (daily.cvd): OK Downloading daily.cvd [*] daily.cvd updated (version: 158,