Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-24 Thread christian laubscher
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: [...] > /* #define SESSION */ /* > * Keep one command connection open to clamd, otherwise > a new * command connection is created for each new email > */ > > recompile, install, restart,

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread christian laubscher
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:12:49PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > > slack 9.1, > Is that Linux? Interesting, I've never heard of this problem > on Linux, only BSD. it's a vanilla 2.4.26 linux kernel. and: i *never* had freshclam hangs before .81rc1, and on two out of three db updates since. -- __

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread Nigel Horne
On Sun, 2005-01-23 at 14:05, christian laubscher wrote: > On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:47:41PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > > > Are you running BSD? > > sorry for having left out information i thought not relevant: > > slack 9.1, Is that Linux? Interesting, I've never heard of this problem on Linu

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread N Fung
--- Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 13:29, christian laubscher > wrote: > > > since .81rc1, however, freshclam kind of 'freezes' > after an update; though > > it seemingly updates the database, it doesn't > notify clamd, as per > > freshclam.log and clamd.log, a

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread christian laubscher
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 01:47:41PM +, Nigel Horne wrote: > Are you running BSD? sorry for having left out information i thought not relevant: slack 9.1, sendmail 8.12.10, gcc 3.2.3, libc 2.3.2. board is 440bx-ish, pentium-ii (deschutes) stepping 2. -- __

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread christian laubscher
On Sun, Jan 23, 2005 at 02:35:03PM +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote: [...] > /* #define SESSION */ /* [...] > recompile, install, restart, and let us know if it fixes the problem. thank you - done. i'll wait for the next few updates and let you know. -- ___ h

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread Nigel Horne
On Sunday 23 Jan 2005 13:29, christian laubscher wrote: > since .81rc1, however, freshclam kind of 'freezes' after an update; though > it seemingly updates the database, it doesn't notify clamd, as per > freshclam.log and clamd.log, and it no longer gets its signal 14 from then > on. Are you

Re: [Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Sun, 23 Jan 2005 14:29:33 +0100 christian laubscher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > i am running freshclam as a daemon with 25 updates a day. > > was always running smooth and reliably. :-) > > since .81rc1, however, freshclam kind of 'freezes' after an update; Please edit clamav-milter.c and c

[Clamav-users] freshclam .81rc1

2005-01-23 Thread christian laubscher
i am running freshclam as a daemon with 25 updates a day. was always running smooth and reliably. :-) since .81rc1, however, freshclam kind of 'freezes' after an update; though it seemingly updates the database, it doesn't notify clamd, as per freshclam.log and clamd.log, and it no longer get