Cedric Foll wrote:
> > Here are three infected mails (http://oban.ac-rouen.fr/virus/) get from
> > my postfix server.
> > When I extract manualy the attachement (with a mimencode -u) viruses are
> > detected by clamscan. When I scan them directly with clamscan they
> > aren't detected (I'm using cl
Am 28.10.2003 um 17:07 schrieb Cedric Foll:
Here are three infected mails (http://oban.ac-rouen.fr/virus/) get
from
my postfix server.
When I extract manualy the attachement (with a mimencode -u) viruses
are
detected by clamscan. When I scan them directly with clamscan they
aren't detected (I'm
> Here are three infected mails (http://oban.ac-rouen.fr/virus/) get from
> my postfix server.
> When I extract manualy the attachement (with a mimencode -u) viruses are
> detected by clamscan. When I scan them directly with clamscan they
> aren't detected (I'm using clamav0.6).
I works well with
> What is the format of your mail files ? We may need some samples to
> implement support for it.
>
Here are three infected mails (http://oban.ac-rouen.fr/virus/) get from
my postfix server.
When I extract manualy the attachement (with a mimencode -u) viruses are
detected by clamscan. When I sca
On Mon, 27 Oct 2003 12:04:50 -0500
gabriel russell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Under either clamav-devel-20031027 or clamav-0.60, using either
> clamdscan or clamscan, if I scan an email containing a virus, the
> virus is not seen, but the detatched exe, even zipped, is identified
> as a virus.
Under either clamav-devel-20031027 or clamav-0.60, using either
clamdscan or clamscan, if I scan an email containing a virus, the virus
is not seen, but the detatched exe, even zipped, is identified as a
virus. I've tried with ScanMail both enabled and disabled in
clamav.conf. Am I doing this w
