On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 13:39:12 -0400 in [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris
Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't know if it is because I built a 0.80 rpm and installed it or
> if it is because of signature version 535 being released, however it
> has stopped.
Most likely the former I would expect. Ther
> Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > version 534) I have been matching a ton of false positives on .jpg and
> > .tif files for the JPEG.Comment exploits.
>
> Please don't be an egoist. You should report the false positive file on
> our website:
For what it's worth -- as I was gathering d
version 534) I have been matching a ton of false positives on .jpg and
.tif files for the JPEG.Comment exploits.
Please don't be an egoist. You should report the false positive file on
our website:
http://www.clamav.net/sendvirus.html
to allow us to fix the problem globally.
Hello,
I did not want
On Mon, 18 Oct 2004 11:31:34 -0400
Chris Conn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Is it possible in clamav to disable a particular signature? I am
> using 0.80rc4 and since this morning (after downloading signature file
No, it isn't.
> version 534) I have been matching a ton of false posit
Hello,
Is it possible in clamav to disable a particular signature? I am using
0.80rc4 and since this morning (after downloading signature file version
534) I have been matching a ton of false positives on .jpg and .tif
files for the JPEG.Comment exploits.
If upgrading to 0.80 release is a requ
