On Mon, 9 Jun 2008 13:05:30 +0400
Igor Zinovik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On июн 09 09:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> >On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:30:29 +0400
> >
> >Your clamd is skipping some signatures (PUA and/or phishing sigs).
>
> Does this meads that clamd works incorrectly?
No, it doesn't. It sk
On июн 09 09:03, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:30:29 +0400
>
>Your clamd is skipping some signatures (PUA and/or phishing sigs).
Does this meads that clamd works incorrectly?
___
Help us build a comprehensive ClamAV guide: visit http://wiki
On Sat, 7 Jun 2008 21:30:29 +0400
Igor Zinovik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello, clamav users.
>
> I'm wondering why amount of signatures shown in freshclam and clamd logs
> are different?
[...]
> freshclam reports that my local database has 309399 signatures, but
> clamd reports that
Hello, clamav users.
I'm wondering why amount of signatures shown in freshclam and clamd logs
are different?
# tail -n 20 /var/log/clamav/freshclam.log
main.cvd is up to date (version: 46, sigs: 231834, f-level: 26, builder: sven)
daily.cvd version from DNS: 7395
daily.cld is up to date
