On Tue, 2007-06-26 at 08:43 -0700, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> guenther wrote:
> > On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 20:56 -0400, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> >> When I originally started using clamav, clamscan could handle my low
> >> (SOHO) volume of email quite well, but recently, it started taking
> >> over 20 secs
guenther wrote:
> On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 20:56 -0400, Paul Kosinski wrote:
>> When I originally started using clamav, clamscan could handle my low
>> (SOHO) volume of email quite well, but recently, it started taking
>> over 20 secs to scan a short email,
> [...]
>> So I decided to try clamdscan, ag
On Sun, 2007-06-24 at 20:56 -0400, Paul Kosinski wrote:
> When I originally started using clamav, clamscan could handle my low
> (SOHO) volume of email quite well, but recently, it started taking
> over 20 secs to scan a short email,
[...]
> So I decided to try clamdscan, again.
> What an incredib
