On Thu, 2 Oct 2003 09:55:04 +0300 Odhiambo Washington <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of
> clamav
> on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for
> some
> time without disappointment when it comes to supervising th
Odhiambo Washington wrote:
Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav
on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some
time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with
daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to co
> Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav
> on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some
> time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with
> daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to completely defy daemo
Okay, I know this is not good at all, that I run the CVS version of clamav
on a production box. It's suicide. I've run the daily snapshots for some
time without disappointment when it comes to supervising the service with
daemontools. However, something in CVS seems to completely defy daemontools!
