On Fri, 2005-05-06 at 08:57 -0500, Phillip Salzman wrote:
> These are pretty heavily loaded machines. They each handle about 2M
> msgs/day, but at the same time they're pretty beefy with lots of
> resources (which aren't appearing to be used very much.)
>
> Would someone have any suggestions on
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users-
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phillip Salzman
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:03 AM
> To: ClamAV users ML
> Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav dying & accept() errors in syslog
>
>
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Phillip
Salzman
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 11:03 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: RE: [Clamav-users] clamav dying & accept() errors in syslog
It could be, but the -STABLE we're running is from over a year after the
"
v-users] clamav dying & accept() errors in syslog
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:48 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:40, Phillip Salzman wrote:
> >
> > --
> > May 4 13:39:03 lora clamav-milter: ClamAv: accept() returned
invalid
> > socket (Result too l
On Wed, 2005-05-04 at 16:48 +0100, Nigel Horne wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:40, Phillip Salzman wrote:
> >
> > --
> > May 4 13:39:03 lora clamav-milter: ClamAv: accept() returned invalid
> > socket (Result too large), try again
> > May 4 13:39:28 lora last message repeated 9 times
> > --
children=5
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Nigel Horne
Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:49 AM
To: ClamAV users ML
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav dying & accept() errors in syslog
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:40, Phillip Salzman wrote:
&
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:40, Phillip Salzman wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I just put clamav (and clamav-milter) into production on two fairly
> large Sendmail servers. Before doing this, I tested it on a box and
> didn't have any problems.
>
> It seems that I'm having a couple possibly unrelated issue
Hello,
I just put clamav (and clamav-milter) into production on two fairly
large Sendmail servers. Before doing this, I tested it on a box and
didn't have any problems.
It seems that I'm having a couple possibly unrelated issues. First of
all, I have seen several clamav-milter processes eating
