Re: [Clamav-users] clamav as postfix check_policy_service,

2006-11-27 Thread Dennis Peterson
> > I do understand that pre acceptance processing raises the performance > bar. I believe I can budget the resources required, and I am willing to > revert if needed. > > Does anyone have clamav implemented as a policy service in postfix? The only way I know to get what you want is with the Cla

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav as postfix check_policy_service, not content_filter

2006-11-27 Thread Ralf Hildebrandt
* Christopher Cleveland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any implementation > notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content filter. A policy server never gets to see the CONTENT of a mail, but merely meta information (sender, recipient, client

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav as postfix check_policy_service, not content_filter

2006-11-27 Thread Noel Jones
At 01:55 PM 11/27/2006, Christopher Cleveland wrote: My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any implementation notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content filter. I already have amavisd-new/clamd working, but would like to move the virus scan from post acceptance to pr

[Clamav-users] clamav as postfix check_policy_service, not content_filter

2006-11-27 Thread Christopher Cleveland
My quick review of the archive/google did not turn up any implementation notes for using clamav as a policy rather than content filter. I already have amavisd-new/clamd working, but would like to move the virus scan from post acceptance to pre acceptance. By making this chance, the sender's MTA wil