> > Kevin Clark wrote:
> > Craig is correct - I would like clamav-milter to log clean files as
> > well as infected ones much like it used to.
>
> Hi Kevin,
> I think this is pretty pointless as that would basically duplicate any
> line already in the logs. That's expecially true if you are logging
Kevin Clark wrote:
>>> What am I missing?
>>>
>> I believe Kevin is seeking an option similar to clamd's LogClean option
>> in clamav-milter.
>>
>> From clamd.conf:
>>
>>
>>
>> # Also log clean files. Useful in debugging but drastically increases
>> the
>> # log size.
>> # Default: no
>>
Kevin Clark wrote:
> Craig is correct - I would like clamav-milter to log clean files as well as
> infected ones much like it used to.
Hi Kevin,
I think this is pretty pointless as that would basically duplicate any
line already in the logs. That's expecially true if you are logging via
syslog.
T
> > What am I missing?
> >
>
> I believe Kevin is seeking an option similar to clamd's LogClean option
> in clamav-milter.
>
> From clamd.conf:
>
>
>
> # Also log clean files. Useful in debugging but drastically increases
> the
> # log size.
> # Default: no
> LogClean yes
Craig is correc
aCaB wrote:
> Kevin Clark wrote:
>> ...clamav-milter still does not log every scanning event to either
>> /var/log/maillog or its own logfile /var/log/clamav/clamav-milter.log
>>
>
> Hi Kevin,
>
> As you may guess, "LogInfected" logs infected messages.
> Your mail log should already have logs
Kevin Clark wrote:
> I appreciate the quick response but I'm sorry to say that making the changes
> you suggested to clamav-milter.conf does not have the desired effect.
>
> With these values in clamav-milter.conf...
>
> LogFile /var/log/clamav/clamav-milter.log
> LogSyslog yes
> LogFacility LOG
> > I'm following up on a previous post about logging to maillog:
> >
> > http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20090408.063308.16623e5a.en.html
> >
> > I am using Sendmail 8.13 on CentOS-4 but whereas previously with
> 0.94.2 I would get a log entry in /var/log/maillog for every scanned
> message I now
Kevin Clark wrote:
> I'm following up on a previous post about logging to maillog:
>
> http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20090408.063308.16623e5a.en.html
>
> I am using Sendmail 8.13 on CentOS-4 but whereas previously with 0.94.2 I
> would get a log entry in /var/log/maillog for every scanned mes
I'm following up on a previous post about logging to maillog:
http://lurker.clamav.net/message/20090408.063308.16623e5a.en.html
I am using Sendmail 8.13 on CentOS-4 but whereas previously with 0.94.2 I would
get a log entry in /var/log/maillog for every scanned message I now only get a
log even
