Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-16 Thread Michael Dankov
hi! On Tue, 16 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>> Do you need to restart both clamav-milter and clamdscan, or only one of MB>> them? MB> MB>I restart both clamd and clamav-milter. Is restarting clamav-milter only makes no sense? MB>P.S. This is a dual processor box - any remote possibility o

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-16 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Michael Dankov wrote: > Hi! > > Look, two minutes before SelfCheck there is milter thread 8880 started, and > I do not see when it finishes. Is something wrong with it? I have no log entry of that one ever finishing. > At the moment I have no ideas what is going wrong in your case, following is

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-13 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Saturday 13 Dec 2003 4:08 pm, Internet Helpdesk wrote: > What the default number of --max-children if one doesn't specify it in the > command line? There is no default, it works the same as spamass-milter, i.e. it only caps if you tell it to. I ha

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-13 Thread Internet Helpdesk
What the default number of --max-children if one doesn't specify it in the command line? -Troy - Original Message - From: "Michael Dankov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Saturday, December 13, 2003 3:01 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clam

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-13 Thread Michael Dankov
Hi! On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>Dec 12 07:16:35 castor clamav-milter[8758]: clean message from MB><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> MB>Dec 12 07:18:08 castor clamav-milter[8880]: clamfi_connect: connection MB>from castor.acu.ac.uk [194.81.120.81] MB>Dec 12 07:20:23 castor clamd[12601]: SelfChe

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-12 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Michael Dankov wrote: > Do you still have timeouts reported by clamd? Be sure you enable clamd > logging either by LogFile or LogSyslog in clamav.conf. I have "LogSyslog" set in clamav.conf, and the last time it hiccuped was this morning, starting at about 7:20. I'm not seeing explicit timeout

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-12 Thread Michael Dankov
Hi! On Fri, 12 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>>>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL MB>>>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL MB> MB>CVS snapshot from 9th December. MB>$ grep "private data" ./sendmail-8.12.10/libmilte

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-12 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 3:43 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL >>Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL > > > Thi

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-11 Thread Internet Helpdesk
CTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:43 AM Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Michael Dankov wrote: > >>Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. >>More

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-11 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Thursday 11 Dec 2003 3:43 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12303]: ClamAv: private data not NULL > Dec 11 14:08:33 castor clamav-milter[12301]: ClamAv: private data not NULL This message does not appear in clamav-mil

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-11 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Michael Dankov wrote: > >>Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. >>More timeouts, more unstability. Current default behavior of clamav-milter >>is to connect to clamd as soon as sendmail receives "mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" >>from mail

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-10 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Michael Dankov wrote: > > Clamd+clamav-milter are quite unstable when clamd sessions are timed out. > More timeouts, more unstability. Current default behavior of clamav-milter > is to connect to clamd as soon as sendmail receives "mail from: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>" > from mail client. Some mail clie

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-09 Thread Michael Dankov
On Tue, 9 Dec 2003, Mike Brodbelt wrote: MB>Just a quick note to point out that the problem with clamd blocking and MB>then clamav-milter spawning a ridiculous number of chils processes is MB>still not fixed in the CVS snapshot from today. I see this in the logs:- MB> MB>Dec 9 16:08:49 castor cla

Re: [Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-09 Thread Matthew Trent
On Tuesday 09 December 2003 09:42 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Just a quick note to point out that the problem with clamd blocking and > then clamav-milter spawning a ridiculous number of chils processes is > still not fixed in the CVS snapshot from today. I see this in the logs:- > > > Dec 9 16:08:

[Clamav-users] clamav-milter - runaway process problem

2003-12-09 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Just a quick note to point out that the problem with clamd blocking and then clamav-milter spawning a ridiculous number of chils processes is still not fixed in the CVS snapshot from today. I see this in the logs:- Dec 9 16:08:49 castor clamd[22701]: Self checking every 3600 seconds. Dec 9 16: