Re: weirdness in FC1 (was: Re: [Clamav-users] clam devel-20031223 has mime decoding problems)

2003-12-29 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Mon, 29 Dec 2003 12:40:06 -0300 René Bellora <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > so, i went to report 'desde.exe', which i knew it was a Magistr > variant, but the test-clamav web interface do detect it... Then, i do > another 'freshclam -v', tried again, but clamscan continues saying > 'OK' Please s

weirdness in FC1 (was: Re: [Clamav-users] clam devel-20031223 has mime decoding problems)

2003-12-29 Thread René Bellora
Nigel Horne wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 23 Dec 2003 4:10 pm, René Bellora wrote: hi! i upgraded from clam 0.65 to clam devel-20031223. After the upgrade, i checked some archived infected mails. I found the '--mbox' option miss some viruses it used to catc

Re: [Clamav-users] clam devel-20031223 has mime decoding problems

2003-12-23 Thread Nigel Horne
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On Tuesday 23 Dec 2003 4:10 pm, René Bellora wrote: > hi! > > i upgraded from clam 0.65 to clam devel-20031223. After the upgrade, > i checked some archived infected mails. I found the '--mbox' option miss > some viruses it used to catch. Once unpa

[Clamav-users] clam devel-20031223 has mime decoding problems

2003-12-23 Thread René Bellora
hi! i upgraded from clam 0.65 to clam devel-20031223. After the upgrade, i checked some archived infected mails. I found the '--mbox' option miss some viruses it used to catch. Once unpacked, clamscan detects the virus here is one sample (i couldn't say if it's always the same case, ther