On Thu, 2004-04-29 at 15:05, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:06:23 -0700
> "Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just so all will know ;-)
> >
> > It seems that 0.65 isn't smart enough to notice the difference - I
> > didn't get the warning on that box... but I'm upgrading
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:06:23 -0700
> "Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Just so all will know ;-)
> >
> > It seems that 0.65 isn't smart enough to notice the difference - I
> > didn't get the warning on that box... but I'm upgrading anyways..
On Thu, 29 Apr 2004 09:06:23 -0700
"Mitch (WebCob)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just so all will know ;-)
>
> It seems that 0.65 isn't smart enough to notice the difference - I
> didn't get the warning on that box... but I'm upgrading anyways...
>
> I'm assume the version smarts were added arou
Just so all will know ;-)
It seems that 0.65 isn't smart enough to notice the difference - I didn't
get the warning on that box... but I'm upgrading anyways...
I'm assume the version smarts were added around 0.67?
Or is there some config value that causes me to not see a warning?
Thanks.
m/
