RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-04 Thread Diego d'Ambra
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Shawn Tayler > Sent: 4. marts 2004 05:59 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5.. > > > The Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-x de

Re: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-03 Thread Shawn Tayler
On Wed, 3 Mar 2004 16:19:02 +0100 "Diego d'Ambra" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> exclaimed: > The Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-x detects e-mails infected with password > protected zip files and it also detects some of the later variants. > > Best regards, > Diego d'Ambra I find it interesting that the msgs with the

RE: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-03 Thread Diego d'Ambra
> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:clamav-users- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Andy Fiddaman > Sent: 3. marts 2004 15:51 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5.. > > > I just received a few e-m

[Clamav-users] Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5..

2004-03-03 Thread Andy Fiddaman
I just received a few e-mails which were detected as Worm.Bagle.F-zippwd-5 but when I extracted the files, some of them were identified as Worm.Bagle.I instead of Worm.Bagle.F. Is this a problem with the signature or a double infected file (or can you tell me how to find out for myself?) ? I know