On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 at 13:17:40 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
[...]
> Secondly full file system scanning.
>
> [...] The second is easy enough, however,
> when I used clamdscan the file system scan consumes inordinate amount of
> CPU resources. I've tried starting clamd with a nice value of 17 an
I tried... but again I'm dealing with a virtualized environment and penguin
1 cant see if penguin 2 is using 50% of the CPU. Thats all handled by the
VM hipervisor. Never had enough individual system load to make nice show
me any difference. Figured nice was a long shot at best but I do not know
On Wed, 2005-01-26 at 13:17 -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> The first part I am not sure how to do. The second is easy enough, however,
> when I used clamdscan the file system scan consumes inordinate amount of
> CPU resources. I've tried starting clamd with a nice value of 17 and
> running clam
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:32:58 -0600 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
n.us [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> (sorry for the non-internet style reply folks, our e-mail admin
> people have our clients so locked down I cannot reply 'internet
> style'. I can see the option, I just cannot use it.)
Seems to me that your
I did read 4.1.1 - It specifically states that "...It is not required to
run clamd - furthermore, you shouldn't run Dazuko on production systems."
So I stopped there. Since I require this on a production system. I was
hoping there was another option other than the Dazuko module. I have qualms
about
On Wed, 26 Jan 2005 13:17:40 -0600
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Firstly, real time file system protection.
RTM (clamdoc.pdf, "4.1.1 On-access scanning")
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
\..._
Seems to me like Clam AV has a lot of mail filtering capabilities, which is
goodness. I am, however wanting it for real time file system protection. I
presume it can do this, but I am unsure how to make it do so.
To give you an idea of the environment:
SLES8 SP3 (2.4 kernel) is the flavour of Lin
