Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-03 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Nathan Brink wrote: > Henrik K wrote: >> On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:11:08PM -0500, Nathan Brink wrote: >> >>> I don't like it when other programs do this because it departs from the >>> normal output of ./configure scripts. >>> >> What exactly are you doing with the output that it bothers

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-03 Thread Nathan Brink
Henrik K wrote: > On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:11:08PM -0500, Nathan Brink wrote: > >> I don't like it when other programs do this because it departs from the >> normal output of ./configure scripts. >> > > What exactly are you doing with the output that it bothers you and where is > this "

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-02 Thread Henrik K
On Sun, Mar 01, 2009 at 04:11:08PM -0500, Nathan Brink wrote: > > I don't like it when other programs do this because it departs from the > normal output of ./configure scripts. What exactly are you doing with the output that it bothers you and where is this "standard" defined? __

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-02 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Dennis Peterson wrote: > Török Edwin wrote: >> The problem is that the output from ./configure is lost after you >> install ClamAV. > > That is absurd. > > ./configure |tee config.rpt > >> On 2009-03-02 01:41, Dennis Peterson wrote: >>> but the objective of summaries is to >>> provide self-hel

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-02 Thread Dennis Peterson
Török Edwin wrote: > On 2009-03-01 23:32, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: >> Some examples about clamav : >> >> * Solaris don't have ncurses library - so, clamdtop won't be built. This >> isn't critical. But it's interesting to know that clamdtop won't be >> built and the library wasn't found.

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-02 Thread Jason Bertoch
> -Original Message- > From: clamav-users-boun...@lists.clamav.net [mailto:clamav-users- > boun...@lists.clamav.net] On Behalf Of Nathan Brink > Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 4:11 PM > To: ClamAV users ML > Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions > > > *

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-02 Thread Török Edwin
On 2009-03-01 23:32, Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Some examples about clamav : > > * Solaris don't have ncurses library - so, clamdtop won't be built. This > isn't critical. But it's interesting to know that clamdtop won't be > built and the library wasn't found. And configure shall not s

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread Dennis Peterson
Cruz >> Sent: Sunday, March 01, 2009 4:33 PM >> To: ClamAV users ML >> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions >> >> Nathan Brink wrote: >> >>>> >>> I don't think it is a good idea to add extra summary code to >>> ./configur

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread shuttlebox
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 12:04 AM, Gary L Burnore wrote: > However, www.sunfreeware.com has ncurses 5.6 in pkg form > which is usually installed for other reasons anyway. And OpenCSW has ncurses 5.7: http://www.opencsw.org/packages/ncurses -- /peter __

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread Gary L Burnore
Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions > > Nathan Brink wrote: > > >> > > I don't think it is a good idea to add extra summary code to > > ./configure. I don't like it when other programs do this because it > > departs from the normal outpu

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Nathan Brink wrote: >> > I don't think it is a good idea to add extra summary code to > ./configure. I don't like it when other programs do this because it > departs from the normal output of ./configure scripts. Maybe if a > configure option --enable-all or --with-all was added, the config

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread Nathan Brink
Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote: > Hello, > > I have two suggestions : > > * It could be interesting to add tcp_wrapper (or equivalent - not so > difficult to code it) support to clamd. > This sounds good. tcp-wrappers would add security to clamds listening to a network which seems to be la

Re: [Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread david
Seems reasonable... Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz wrote .. > > Hello, > > I have two suggestions : > > * It could be interesting to add tcp_wrapper (or equivalent - not so > difficult to code it) support to clamd. > > * When running configure, it could be interesting to display a summary > whe

[Clamav-users] Two suggestions

2009-03-01 Thread Jose-Marcio Martins da Cruz
Hello, I have two suggestions : * It could be interesting to add tcp_wrapper (or equivalent - not so difficult to code it) support to clamd. * When running configure, it could be interesting to display a summary when it finishes : what libraries wasn't found, what's lacking, a summary of wha