>> I ran the 3 tests and I can detect tests 2 & 3, but not test #1, even if
>> I place the raw text of the e-mail into a file and scan it directly with
>> clamdscan. Thoughts?
>
> Same results here.
> clamdscan being called via simscan.
Ooops...Make sure the email you create for test #1 is a HTML
René Berber wrote:
> Same result, does the "html" in the signature means the message should
> be in that format?
Answer: Yes.
Sorry for the noise, I just re-tested and it does detect the string IFF
the message is in html AND the actual string is inside html tags.
--
René Berber
_
Bill Landry wrote:
> Steve Basford wrote:
>> Sorry to hijack the list...just a few quick updates:
>>
>> 1. Signature Tests
>>
>> I've introduced a few Sanesecurity Signature tests, to help you make
>> sure you are getting the best out of the signatures available. Make sure
>> you pass all three
Bill Landry wrote:
> Steve Basford wrote:
>> Sorry to hijack the list...just a few quick updates:
>>
>> 1. Signature Tests
>>
>> I've introduced a few Sanesecurity Signature tests, to help you make
>> sure you are getting the best out of the signatures available. Make sure
>> you pass all three
Steve Basford wrote:
> Sorry to hijack the list...just a few quick updates:
>
> 1. Signature Tests
>
> I've introduced a few Sanesecurity Signature tests, to help you make
> sure you are getting the best out of the signatures available. Make sure
> you pass all three tests (scroll down page) h
Sorry to hijack the list...just a few quick updates:
1. Signature Tests
I've introduced a few Sanesecurity Signature tests, to help you make
sure you are getting the best out of the signatures available. Make sure
you pass all three tests (scroll down page) here:
http://www.sanesecurity.com/c
