On Wed, 03 Mar 2004 10:45:34 +0700
"Fajar A. Nugraha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas Seifert wrote:
>
> >clamscan used the new dir (its default directory) and didn't use
> >the path given in clamav.conf!?
> >
> >
> >
> I believe clamscan don't read clamav.conf at all; It uses hard-coded
Thomas Seifert wrote:
clamscan used the new dir (its default directory) and didn't use
the path given in clamav.conf!?
I believe clamscan don't read clamav.conf at all; It uses hard-coded
compiled settings.
I might be wrong :)
Regards,
Fajar
---
Thomas Seifert wrote:
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:15:19 -0500 Mike Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Thomas,
On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:09, Thomas Seifert wrote:
in my last mail I told that clamscan founds the virus while clamd doesn't.
Here's some more evidence for this:
Reload clamd and see if tha
On Tue, 02 Mar 2004 15:15:19 -0500 Mike Cathey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> On Tue, 2004-03-02 at 14:09, Thomas Seifert wrote:
> > in my last mail I told that clamscan founds the virus while clamd doesn't.
> > Here's some more evidence for this:
>
> Reload clamd and see if that makes
