I am not sure if this will work or not since I haven't tried it, but what
about taking advantage of this:
http://it.slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=04/08/28/2330252&tid=95&tid=218
If you could use this URL to get the database it should work.
http://database.clamav.net.nyud.net:8090/
Also, I could
On Wed, 2004-08-25 at 16:28, Mitch (WebCob) wrote:
<..snip..>
> Perhaps (not sure of the DNS system in place) could be arranged so that 10%
> of the requests a full primary mirror receives could be directed to a
> secondary level mirror. With a committment of only roughly 10GB per month,
> we'd get
Mitch (WebCob) wrote the following on 08/26/2004 10:47 AM :
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham
Toal
Aren't we missing something obvious here? Shouldn't we be using some
sort of distributed technology like BitTorrent?
That's been as
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Graham
> Toal
>
> Aren't we missing something obvious here? Shouldn't we be using some
> sort of distributed technology like BitTorrent?
>
That's been asked and answered... Bittorrent is meant to optimi
> In fact that is why I chose to use the term franchisee earlier - so far
> I've described only the first layer in all of this. A full working model
> would be a tree structure not unlike the Amway model. Only without the
> huckstering.
> Associate it with a business model that creates revenue for
On Wed, 25 Aug 2004, Dennis Peterson wrote:
> Tim Howell said:
> >
> > I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than
> > I've got available.
>
> Those figures don't account for clever scripting that some folks are
> willing to implement that defeat the round-robin distribu
Tim Howell said:
>
>
> I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than
> I've got available.
>
Those figures don't account for clever scripting that some folks are
willing to implement that defeat the round-robin distribution now in
place. If you have a faster than average
Graham Toal said:
>> Currently each mirror contributes around 100GB of traffic monthly
>>
>> Perhaps (not sure of the DNS system in place) could be arranged so that
>> 10%
>> of the requests a full primary mirror receives could be directed to a
>> secondary level mirror. With a committment of only
> Currently each mirror contributes around 100GB of traffic monthly
>
> Perhaps (not sure of the DNS system in place) could be arranged so that 10%
> of the requests a full primary mirror receives could be directed to a
> secondary level mirror. With a committment of only roughly 10GB per month,
>
> I would love to setup a mirror, but 10Mbps and 100GB/month is more than
> I've got available.
>
> --TWH
By my count that makes 5 of us I recall seeing volunteer and it isn't even
an option yet.
As we are already trampling the rules with cnames to cnames... what about
this... the second tier cna
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
>> It would help if you could define what you mean by a second-tier
mirror.
>> If you allow just anyone to connect, then what makes you second-tier
>> instead of primary-tier? And if you restrict your connections to
come
>> from within your domain,
> > > Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with
> less than the
> > > mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is
> > > an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such an
> idea and for
> > > the developers to respond whether or not the idea has
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Damian Menscher wrote:
> On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Tim Howell wrote:
>
> > Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with less than the
> > mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is
> > an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such
On Mon, 23 Aug 2004, Tim Howell wrote:
> Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with less than the
> mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is
> an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such an idea and for
> the developers to respond whether
Someone recently suggested the idea of allowing sites with less than the
mirror site requirements becoming second-tier mirrors. This thread is
an attempt to see what kind of interest there is in such an idea and for
the developers to respond whether or not the idea has merit.
--TWH
15 matches
Mail list logo
