On Fri, 16 Feb 2007 15:28:18 +
Ian Abbott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> My proposal is to change the order from:
>
> * fork (daemonize)
> * load database
> * open sockets
>
> to:
>
> * load database
> * open sockets
> * fork (daemonize)
This won't work. In hardware accelerated m
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> > It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
> > response, instead of generating a "socket does not exist" error.
>
> So that they could potentially wait around until their internal timeout,
> instead of immediately returning?
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 10:17:18AM -0500, Christopher X. Candreva said:
> On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
>
> > What would be the point of having a socket ready before clamd is
> > ready to do any work? Maybe I'm missing something.
>
> It would be something for other programs to connect
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:28:18PM +, Ian Abbott said:
> On 16/02/2007 15:14, Stephen Gran wrote:
> >What would be the point of having a socket ready before clamd is ready
> >to do any work? Maybe I'm missing something.
>
> My proposal is to change the order from:
>
> * fork (daemonize)
>
On 16/02/2007 15:14, Stephen Gran wrote:
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:04:42PM +, Ian Abbott said:
On 16/02/2007 13:51, James Kosin wrote:
Ian Abbott wrote:
On 14/02/2007 20:09, Rick Pim wrote:
it's true; if i start clamd and then check, the clamd socket isn't
there. but if i leave clamd
On Fri, 16 Feb 2007, Stephen Gran wrote:
> What would be the point of having a socket ready before clamd is ready
> to do any work? Maybe I'm missing something.
It would be something for other programs to connect to and wait for a
response, instead of generating a "socket does not exist" error.
On Fri, Feb 16, 2007 at 03:04:42PM +, Ian Abbott said:
> On 16/02/2007 13:51, James Kosin wrote:
> >Ian Abbott wrote:
> >>On 14/02/2007 20:09, Rick Pim wrote:
> >>> it's true; if i start clamd and then check, the clamd socket isn't
> >>> there. but if i leave clamd alone for a few seconds t
On 16/02/2007 13:51, James Kosin wrote:
Ian Abbott wrote:
On 14/02/2007 20:09, Rick Pim wrote:
it's true; if i start clamd and then check, the clamd socket isn't
there. but if i leave clamd alone for a few seconds the socket
appears and clamav-milter starts happily after that. i've tuc
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Ian Abbott wrote:
> On 14/02/2007 20:09, Rick Pim wrote:
>>it's true; if i start clamd and then check, the clamd socket isn't
>>there. but if i leave clamd alone for a few seconds the socket
>>appears and clamav-milter starts happily after
On 14/02/2007 20:09, Rick Pim wrote:
it's true; if i start clamd and then check, the clamd socket isn't
there. but if i leave clamd alone for a few seconds the socket
appears and clamav-milter starts happily after that. i've tucked
a "sleep 30" into the startup script and things see
10 matches
Mail list logo
