On Fri, Mar 05, 2004 at 08:38:48AM +, Trog wrote:
| On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:15, Virgo PÃrna wrote:
| > On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:55:17 +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
| > > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 at 19:14:32 -0500, Tim B wrote:
| > >>
| > >> Does this mean that 0.67 will now detect the the encrypted ve
On Fri, 05 Mar 2004 08:38:48 +, Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> No, it'll match with just the encrypted zip file.
>
Right, disable-archive seems to do the magic...:)
--
Virgo Pärna
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
---
This SF.Net email is s
On Fri, 2004-03-05 at 08:15, Virgo Pärna wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:55:17 +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> > On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 at 19:14:32 -0500, Tim B wrote:
> >>
> >> Does this mean that 0.67 will now detect the the encrypted versions
> >> regardless of password?
> >
> > Yes.
> >
>
>
On Fri, 5 Mar 2004 01:55:17 +0100, Tomasz Papszun wrote:
> On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 at 19:14:32 -0500, Tim B wrote:
>>
>> Does this mean that 0.67 will now detect the the encrypted versions
>> regardless of password?
>
> Yes.
>
But it's still usable only with full message scan?
--
Virgo Pä
On Thu, 04 Mar 2004 at 19:14:32 -0500, Tim B wrote:
> Diego d'Ambra wrote:
>
> >ClamAV databases updated (04-mar-2004 13:11 GMT): daily.cvd, viruses.db2
> >version: 165
> >
> >Submission: n/a
> >Sender: Diego d'Ambra
> >Virus name: Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
> >Notes: Generic signature to detect passwo
Diego d'Ambra wrote:
ClamAV databases updated (04-mar-2004 13:11 GMT): daily.cvd, viruses.db2
version: 165
Submission: n/a
Sender: Diego d'Ambra
Virus name: Worm.Bagle.Gen-zippwd
Notes: Generic signature to detect password-protected Bagle zip files
Notes: Signature by Trog
Added: Yes
Does this mea
