On Wed, 4 May 2005 16:19:38 +0100 in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] Nigel Horne <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:15, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>
> > All those people "currently running clamav 0.70rc-1" (dated on Mon
> > Mar 15 20:53:10 CET 2004) and "trying to upgrade to 0.83" when 0.84
> > i
> On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:03, Jon Dossey wrote:
> > Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Trying to upgrade to
> > 0.83 to match the other MX, then I'll move them both to 0.84 in the
next
> > couple weeks.
> >
> > /home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:55: undefined reference
to
>
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:03, Jon Dossey wrote:
> Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Trying to upgrade to
> 0.83 to match the other MX, then I'll move them both to 0.84 in the next
> couple weeks.
>
> /home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:55: undefined reference to
> `__res_q
Give me the output of the following commands (without changing them)
because I am looking for correlations.
ls -lsa /isr/lib
+
ls -lsa /lib
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
> From: Dale Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> on a fresh clean e-mail, send me the output of the following commands.
>
> ls -lsa /usr/lib
>
> +++
>
> ls -lsa /usr/local/lib
Before I paste this in, my libresolv lives in /lib
[EMAIL PROTECTED] lib]# ls -l libr*
-rwxr-xr-x
on a fresh clean e-mail, send me the output of the following commands.
ls -lsa /usr/lib
+++
ls -lsa /usr/local/lib
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
> On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:08:10 +0200
> Dörfler Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > thats why he upgraded to 0.84 ;)=
>
> No, he didn't. Read carefully what that lame Sunday school admin has
> written.
Well, I'm glad we're all adults here.
___
htt
On Wednesday 04 May 2005 16:15, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> All those people "currently running clamav 0.70rc-1" (dated on Mon Mar
> 15 20:53:10 CET 2004) and "trying to upgrade to 0.83" when 0.84 is out
> are throwing me off balance.
That's because you're not getting any sleep because of all those Tige
> From: Dale Walsh [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 04, 2005 10:10 AM
> To: Jon Dossey
> Subject: Re: [Clamav-users] Problems building 0.83
>
>
> On May 04, 2005, at 11:03, Jon Dossey wrote:
>
> > Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Tr
On Wed, May 04, 2005 at 10:03:36AM -0500, Jon Dossey said:
> /home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:55: undefined reference to
> `__res_query'
> /home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:62: undefined reference to
> `__dn_expand'
> /home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:77: undefined refer
On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:12:00 +0200
Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:08:10 +0200
> Dörfler Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > thats why he upgraded to 0.84 ;)=
>
> No, he didn't. Read carefully what that lame Sunday school admin has
> written.
All those people
On Wed, 4 May 2005 17:08:10 +0200
Dörfler Andreas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> thats why he upgraded to 0.84 ;)=
No, he didn't. Read carefully what that lame Sunday school admin has
written.
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net
thats why he upgraded to 0.84 ;)=
> -Original Message-
> Tomasz Kojm
>
> On Wed, 4 May 2005 10:03:36 -0500
> "Jon Dossey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Trying to upgrade to
> > 0.83 to match the other MX, then I'll move them both to 0.84
On Wed, 4 May 2005 10:03:36 -0500
"Jon Dossey" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Trying to upgrade to
> 0.83 to match the other MX, then I'll move them both to 0.84 in the
> next couple weeks.
0.83 is no longer supported.
--
oo. Tom
Redhat 8.0, currently running clamav 0.70rc-1. Trying to upgrade to
0.83 to match the other MX, then I'll move them both to 0.84 in the next
couple weeks.
/home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:55: undefined reference to
`__res_query'
/home/sysadmin/clamav-0.83/freshclam/dns.c:62: undefined
15 matches
Mail list logo
