* Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 14:01]: wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:47, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for that. Looks like that is what was causing my problems with
> > clamd!! I will monitor to see the behaviour. I am running CVS code of
> > today>
> > Are there other tune-
Le jeudi 20 Janvier 2005 11:47, Odhiambo Washington a écrit :
> Are there other tune-ups that can be applied to clamd on a very busy
> server?
You can compile clamav with specific optimizations for your CPU using gcc
options (see -march, -O, -mfpmath -msse -mmmx -m3dnow etc...)
By this way, you c
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:47, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> Thanks for that. Looks like that is what was causing my problems with
> clamd!! I will monitor to see the behaviour. I am running CVS code of
> today>
> Are there other tune-ups that can be applied to clamd on a very busy
> server?
As us
* Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 13:37]: wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:33, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
>
> > > > >
> > > > > Sounds like you've built clam with debug enabled. You definitely don't
> > > > > want to do that for a production system.
> > > >
> > > > Not quite! Though I was ru
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:33, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Sounds like you've built clam with debug enabled. You definitely don't
> > > > want to do that for a production system.
> > >
> > > Not quite! Though I was running with Debug enabled in clamd.conf. Is
> > > that what you mea
* Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 13:30]: wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:22, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > * Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 13:00]: wrote:
> > > On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 07:13, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > > I am having a strange problem with clamd. It has become the big
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 10:22, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> * Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 13:00]: wrote:
> > On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 07:13, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > > I am having a strange problem with clamd. It has become the biggest
> > > bottleneck on my SMTP service but I just can't fi
* Trog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [20050120 13:00]: wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 07:13, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> > I am having a strange problem with clamd. It has become the biggest
> > bottleneck on my SMTP service but I just can't figure out why.
> > Perhaps this is not a clamd problem but a hard
On Thu, 2005-01-20 at 07:13, Odhiambo Washington wrote:
> I am having a strange problem with clamd. It has become the biggest
> bottleneck on my SMTP service but I just can't figure out why.
> Perhaps this is not a clamd problem but a hardware problem!
> I have tested both clamav-0.80 and clamav-de
I am having a strange problem with clamd. It has become the biggest
bottleneck on my SMTP service but I just can't figure out why.
Perhaps this is not a clamd problem but a hardware problem!
I have tested both clamav-0.80 and clamav-devel-20050120 today.
On my diagnostics, the mail processing see
10 matches
Mail list logo
