Anton Yuzhaninov wrote:
> Hello, Rob.
>
>
>>> Try this patch:
>>> http://citrin.ru/stuff/clamav/patch-0.90.1-matcher-ac.c
>>>
>>> Also see:
>>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=434
>>>
>
>
>> Is this an issue if using clamdscan vs. clamscan? Is this patch
>> recommended
Hello, Rob.
>> Try this patch:
>> http://citrin.ru/stuff/clamav/patch-0.90.1-matcher-ac.c
>>
>> Also see:
>> https://wwws.clamav.net/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=434
> Is this an issue if using clamdscan vs. clamscan? Is this patch
> recommended for speeding up 0.90.2? We're running 0.88.7 and want
On Thu, 19 Apr 2007, Rick Macdougall wrote:
> > I upgraded clamav a few days ago from 0.90.1 to 0.90.2 and found that
> > clamscan's performance had deminished tremendously. The time required to
> > scan a single 49 KB file increased from 19 seconds to 36 seconds! Now
> > that scanning for viruse
Alan Stern wrote:
> I upgraded clamav a few days ago from 0.90.1 to 0.90.2 and found that
> clamscan's performance had deminished tremendously. The time required to
> scan a single 49 KB file increased from 19 seconds to 36 seconds! Now
> that scanning for viruses is a factor of two slower, my em
I upgraded clamav a few days ago from 0.90.1 to 0.90.2 and found that
clamscan's performance had deminished tremendously. The time required to
scan a single 49 KB file increased from 19 seconds to 36 seconds! Now
that scanning for viruses is a factor of two slower, my email server is
constantly b
