On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 23:39 , Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> sent:
>On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100
>Tomasz Papszun [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> I think that this parameter should be made runtime configurable (in
>> clamav.conf). Not every site compiles Clamav on its own.
>
>You can now setup
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100
Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I think that this parameter should be made runtime configurable (in
> clamav.conf). Not every site compiles Clamav on its own.
You can now setup the limit with ArchiveMaxCompressionRatio in
clamav.conf.
Best regards,
On Mon, 1 Dec 2003 11:20:39 GMT
Tomasz Klim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The right solution is to decompress files block-by-block, and scanning
> only that block, like it is done for reading and scanning file from
> a descriptor. But this requires direct integration of unzip and scan
> code. I kno
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 at 21:24:43 -0800, Chris Paul wrote:
> > On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100
> > Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > I have also seen stopped .doc files compressed with ratio 236.
> > > And .dbf files with ratio 1101. Also, .wav files with ratio 1182.
> > >
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 at 21:24:43 -0800, Chris Paul wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100
> Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > I have also seen stopped .doc files compressed with ratio 236.
> > And .dbf files with ratio 1101. Also, .wav files with ratio 1182.
> >
> > Users send
Tomasz Papszun wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 23:54:14 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900
Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Can someone explain me about the libclamav/scanners.c and this value
at the line 64 ? Should I increase it again ?
Please set it to 70
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 18:24:02 +0100
Tomasz Papszun <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have also seen stopped .doc files compressed with ratio 236.
> And .dbf files with ratio 1101. Also, .wav files with ratio 1182.
>
> Users send quite strange things. So an admin may be forced to set
> ZIPOSDET for s
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 at 23:54:14 +0100, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900
> Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Can someone explain me about the libclamav/scanners.c and this value
> > at the line 64 ? Should I increase it again ?
>
> Please set it to 70 - we
On Fri, 28 Nov 2003 10:11:35 +0900
Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ok, I am going to try this, but could you explain to the list what is
> the point of this parameter ?
if (original_size / compressed_size >= ZIPOSDET) return Oversized.Zip
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo
Ok, I am going to try this, but could you explain to the list what is the
point of this parameter ?
I'll be back if it doesn't work
Thanks for your help
Schlum
On Friday 28 November 2003 07:54, Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900
>
> Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> w
On Thu, 27 Nov 2003 18:03:06 +0900
Jerome Schlumberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Can someone explain me about the libclamav/scanners.c and this value
> at the line 64 ? Should I increase it again ?
Please set it to 70 - we need to find an optimal value.
Best regards,
Tomasz Kojm
--
oo
At 03:03 AM 11/27/2003, you wrote:
Hello everybody,
Two weeks ago I had some problems with a zip filed detected by clamav as
"Oversized Zip". I read the posts and changed the libclamav/scanners.c, the
line 64 as explained to the value of 50. After that everything worked well.
But two days ago, sa
Hello everybody,
Two weeks ago I had some problems with a zip filed detected by clamav as
"Oversized Zip". I read the posts and changed the libclamav/scanners.c, the
line 64 as explained to the value of 50. After that everything worked well.
But two days ago, same story, an "Oversized Zip" was
13 matches
Mail list logo
