Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-23 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 23, 2004, at 12:21 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 9:22 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: I think it's server-th.c As far as I can tell, that file doesn't exist in the 0.65 source. What's the full path? Ahah - you'll need the latest CVS source for that, should have engaged my brain fi

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-23 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 9:22 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: > > I think it's server-th.c > > As far as I can tell, that file doesn't exist in the 0.65 source. > What's the full path? Ahah - you'll need the latest CVS source for that, should have engaged my brain first then I'd have realised that. -Nige

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 22, 2004, at 1:10 PM, Nigel Horne wrote: On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 7:33 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: I tried making the changes to clamd/server.c and I still get the same build errors. Is server.c the right file to change? It doesn't look exactly the same as what you listed. Your listing has a

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 22 Jan 2004 7:33 pm, Mark Edwards wrote: > I tried making the changes to clamd/server.c and I still get the same > build errors. Is server.c the right file to change? It doesn't look > exactly the same as what you listed. Your listing has an I think it's server-th.c -Nigel -- Ni

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 22, 2004, at 1:16 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: [dina:~/Documents/work/clamav-0.65] engineer% patch < ../clamav-0.65-osx.patch patch: Premature `---' at line 15; check line numbers at line 4 Sounds like you've included my signature in the patching! Anyway the context difference isn't for putt

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-22 Thread Nigel Horne
> [dina:~/Documents/work/clamav-0.65] engineer% patch < > ../clamav-0.65-osx.patch > patch: Premature `---' at line 15; check line numbers at line 4 Sounds like you've included my signature in the patching! Anyway the context difference isn't for putting through patch (if it were I would have

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-21 Thread Mark Edwards
On Jan 21, 2004, at 3:11 AM, Nigel Horne wrote: These changes will make clamd compile under OSX10.1. The bad news is it's rather doubtful that ClamAV supports that operating system any more. It's best to ask Tomasz to put the support back in. The good news is that this part of the code is only

Re: [Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-21 Thread Nigel Horne
These changes will make clamd compile under OSX10.1. The bad news is it's rather doubtful that ClamAV supports that operating system any more. It's best to ask Tomasz to put the support back in. The good news is that this part of the code is only called in the event of a crash or through someth

[Clamav-users] OSX build problem with 0.65

2004-01-20 Thread Mark Edwards
Build of clamav-0.65 on OSX 10.1.4 dies in the following manner: /usr/bin/ld: warning unused multiple definitions of symbol _optarg "link editor" definition of _optarg in section (__DATA,__common) /usr/lib/libSystem.dylib(getopt.o) unused definition of _optarg /usr/bin/ld: warning unused multiple