Pablo Alsina wrote:
On 5/28/05, Matt Fretwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this is not your preferred solution, how do you suggest to stop
those scumbags searching for my user-database? Remember I'm not
stopping spammers, I'm stopping user-db harvesters (probably future
spammers).
My pat
> On 5/28/05, Matt Fretwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> G.W. Haywood wrote:
>
> > > We added a sort of tarpitting solution to our sendmail...
> > > clamav-milter seems to be suffering. What happens is that the
> > > maximum number of childs are reached in a 2-4 hour period
> >
> > People with far
Pablo Alsina wrote:
Hi
We have been having some problems lately with our installation. We are
using Sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd as our antivirus solution, over an
RedHat Linux with a 2.4.21 kernel (RH9).
This is somewhat outdated.
Might I recommend you use the newer Fedora Core's or switch
On 27/05/05, Pablo Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> So what we did was to increment the number of childers to an even
> bigger value. But then we started to hit with other problems:
>
> clamav-milter[1932]: ClamAv: thread_create() failed: 12, try again
>
> We did an strace to that process, onl
On Fri, 27 May 2005 18:28:09 -0300
Pablo Alsina <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> We have been having some problems lately with our installation. We are
> using Sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd as our antivirus solution, over an
> RedHat Linux with a 2.4.21 kernel (RH9).
Which version of ClamAV?
Hi
We have been having some problems lately with our installation. We are
using Sendmail+clamav-milter+clamd as our antivirus solution, over an
RedHat Linux with a 2.4.21 kernel (RH9).
We added a sort of tarpitting solution to our sendmail in order to
stop people from scanning our userbase. What
