Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:01:24 -0700
> Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > > ClamAV 0.90 will support the NodalCore hardware accelerator:
> > >
> > > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=458047
> >
> > > With hw acceleration my old Athlo
Trog said this with great authority:
> If your users are also accessing the data via Samba, then use on-access
> scanning via Samba VFS. The vscan module does that
> http://www.openantivirus.org/projects.php#samba-vscan
Another good idea!
CD
Ever lied? You're a liar. Ever stolen? You're a thi
Lionel Bouton said this with great authority:
> You may try to wrap the scan in a Perl script which only scan files with
> modified mtimes.
Good idea!
CD
Ever lied? You're a liar. Ever stolen? You're a thief. Ever hated? The
bible equates hate with murder. Ever lusted? Jesus equated lust w
Jakub Suchy said this with great authority:
> Is it possible to access your data in differrent way than via Samba? Samba
> is very ineffective and slow and is causing overheads. Maybe you should
> also try 2.6.x kernel with more effective I/O scheduler
We're not going through Samba to clamscan the
Chris de Vidal wrote the following on 04/28/05 22:09 :
>Matt Fretwell said this while chewing gum:
>
>
>> Scan on an evening when your users are gone?
>>
>>
>
>Thanks for the fast reply!
>
>A 1.25TB Samba server takes several days to do a full scan with clamscan.
>
>
>
You may try to wrap
Chris de Vidal wrote:
> > <12 line signature snipped>
>
> You'll like my newer, shorter one :-)
>
> CD
>
> Ever lied? You're a liar. Ever stolen? You're a theif. Ever hated?
> The bible equates hate with murder. Ever lusted? Jesus equated lust with
> adultery. You've broken God's law. H
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 10:26 +0200, Jakub Suchy wrote:
> > Rob MacGregor wrote:
> >> On 4/28/05, Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >>>We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
> > Yes I/O bottleneck.
>
> Is it possible to access your data in differrent way than via Samba? Samba
> is very inef
> Rob MacGregor wrote:
>> On 4/28/05, Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>>We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
> Yes I/O bottleneck.
Is it possible to access your data in differrent way than via Samba? Samba
is very ineffective and slow and is causing overheads. Maybe you should
also try
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Rob MacGregor wrote:
> On 4/28/05, Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>ClamAV 0.83 from dag.wieers.com
>>CentOS 3.3 (A.K.A RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3)
>>Kernel 2.4.28
>>
>>I have a full system scan cron job. We have a 1.25TB Samba server t
On 4/28/05, Chris de Vidal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ClamAV 0.83 from dag.wieers.com
> CentOS 3.3 (A.K.A RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3)
> Kernel 2.4.28
>
> I have a full system scan cron job. We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
> causes the load average to go to 5+. When that happens the users n
Todd Lyons said this while chewing gum:
> If the scan is occurring during normal business hours, then yeah, you
> need to nice the heck out of it to keep it from sucking away
> performance. If you know a bit about c, you could add a commandline
> option --delay=x where x is the number of milliseco
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 17:01:24 -0700
Kurt Buff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > ClamAV 0.90 will support the NodalCore hardware accelerator:
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=458047
>
> > With hw acceleration my old Athlon 1200 was able to scan 2GB of
> > d
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> ClamAV 0.90 will support the NodalCore hardware accelerator:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/forum/forum.php?forum_id=458047
> With hw acceleration my old Athlon 1200 was able to scan 2GB of
> data in one minute.
2gb in one minute, ceterus paribus, means roughly 8.5 hours per ter
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 06:15:17PM -0300, René Bellora said:
> clamdscan is way faster
Not necessarily.
Single file:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:~$ clamscan F5D5010.exe
F5D5010.exe: OK
--- SCAN SUMMARY ---
Known viruses: 33876
Engine version: 0.84rc2
Scanned directories: 0
Scanned files:
On Thu, Apr 28, 2005 at 04:18:41PM -0400, Chris de Vidal wrote:
> Have you ever lied, no matter the color? I have. Have you ever stolen
> anything, no matter the value? I have. Have you ever lusted? I have.
> Jesus said whoever looks at a woman with lustful intent has already
> committed adu
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
>With hw acceleration my old Athlon 1200 was able to scan 2GB of data in
>one minute.
>
>
2Gb in one minute!!!
That's pretty impressive - I wouldn't have thought you could do a
directory listing of that much data in one minute (assuming it's not a
single file of course!)
--
Chris de Vidal wanted us to know:
>Is our situation that foreign? I was half expecting someone to tell me
>"We have a 5TB FTP server and can scan it all under 40 minutes with .25
>extra load average! You just have to do this..."
Most people with stuff that large have a three teir system:
1) AV
Morgan Smith said this while chewing gum:
> Do compiler options help? YMMV but if I'm looking for speed I'll
> compile from source or create an RPM from the SRPM, and I'll add some
> optimizations:
> ./configure CFLAGS=-O3 -march=pentium4
>
> The man page for gcc may provide more insight.
OK I'll
Chris de Vidal wrote:
>ClamAV 0.83 from dag.wieers.com
>CentOS 3.3 (A.K.A RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3)
>Kernel 2.4.28
>
>I have a full system scan cron job. We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
>causes the load average to go to 5+. When that happens the users notice
>and I must kill the script.
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:09:55 -0400 (EDT)
"Chris de Vidal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Matt Fretwell said this while chewing gum:
> > Scan on an evening when your users are gone?
>
> Thanks for the fast reply!
>
> A 1.25TB Samba server takes several days to do a full scan with
> clamscan.
Clam
Matt Fretwell said this while chewing gum:
> Surely you're not doing a full scan each time, are you?
Yeah, just like the large Windows boxen we run. It's a corporate
requirement that we scan daily but clamscan is just too slow for a daily
scan so I run it weekly. It's a decent compromise; I'd co
René Bellora wrote:
> clamdscan is way faster
Only on a frequent stop/start type scenario. (Unless things have
changed). For an extended duration scan, any difference would be
negligible.
Matt
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Chris de Vidal wrote:
> > Scan on an evening when your users are gone?
>
> Thanks for the fast reply!
>
> A 1.25TB Samba server takes several days to do a full scan with
> clamscan.
Surely you're not doing a full scan each time, are you? How often do you
scan the system?
I can't answer on
Chris de Vidal wrote:
ClamAV 0.83 from dag.wieers.com
CentOS 3.3 (A.K.A RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3)
Kernel 2.4.28
I have a full system scan cron job. We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
causes the load average to go to 5+. When that happens the users notice
and I must kill the script. I've even
Matt Fretwell said this while chewing gum:
> Scan on an evening when your users are gone?
Thanks for the fast reply!
A 1.25TB Samba server takes several days to do a full scan with clamscan.
CD
Have you ever lied, no matter the color? I have. Have you ever stolen
anything, no matter the valu
Chris de Vidal wrote:
> Ideas?
Scan on an evening when your users are gone?
Matt
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
ClamAV 0.83 from dag.wieers.com
CentOS 3.3 (A.K.A RedHat Enterprise Linux AS3)
Kernel 2.4.28
I have a full system scan cron job. We have a 1.25TB Samba server that
causes the load average to go to 5+. When that happens the users notice
and I must kill the script. I've even reniced it to 19 wit
27 matches
Mail list logo
