Thomas Cameron wrote:
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:51 -0400, JamesDR wrote:
So much for "You get what you pay for" ;-D
Oh, no, not at all! They pay a *lot* for qualified sysadmins who set up
the right tools for the job!
At least that's the argument I use when going in for a raise! :-)
Thoma
>> So much for "You get what you pay for" ;-D
>
> Oh, no, not at all! They pay a *lot* for qualified sysadmins who set up
> the right tools for the job!
Might be an interesting TCO study: Low-cost sysadmins who implement for-pay
solutions that don't work versus the higher-cost sysadmins who imple
On Fri, 2005-06-03 at 10:51 -0400, JamesDR wrote:
> So much for "You get what you pay for" ;-D
Oh, no, not at all! They pay a *lot* for qualified sysadmins who set up
the right tools for the job!
At least that's the argument I use when going in for a raise! :-)
Thomas
___
D.J. Fan wrote:
Just wanted to toss out a kudos to the ClamAV team. ClamAV has caught
every variant of Mytob thrown at it so far as W32/Mytob.AS, while most
other AV scanners struggle to keep their signatures up to date and end
up being a day or more late in detecting variants. Some, such as
Just wanted to toss out a kudos to the ClamAV team. ClamAV has caught
every variant of Mytob thrown at it so far as W32/Mytob.AS, while most
other AV scanners struggle to keep their signatures up to date and end up
being a day or more late in detecting variants. Some, such as Symantec
still d
Just wanted to toss out a kudos to the ClamAV team. ClamAV has caught every
variant of Mytob thrown at it so far as W32/Mytob.AS, while most other AV
scanners struggle to keep their signatures up to date and end up being a day
or more late in detecting variants. Some, such as Symantec still do
