On 11/25/05, Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Okay, So if i understand you correctly, Sober.Y == Sober.U ?
Viruses mutate frequently, and different vendors give different names to
viruses as they get ahold of samples. And, there's no strict line between
versions; one program migh
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:56:15 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
All that i ment that i haven't seen Sober.Y
That's not an answer on my question, too.
You're confusing malware names from various av vendors and without
a proper answer on my question we can
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 09:56:15 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>All that i ment that i haven't seen Sober.Y
> >
> >
> > That's not an answer on my question, too.
> >
> > You're confusing malware names from various av vendors and without
> > a proper answer on my question we
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:59:43 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:41:18 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With sigtool -l I only see the Sober.U, not the Sober.Y
It's not an answer on my qu
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:59:43 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:41:18 +0100
> > Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> >>With sigtool -l I only see the Sober.U, not the Sober.Y
> >
> >
> > It's not an answer on m
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:41:18 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
With sigtool -l I only see the Sober.U, not the Sober.Y
It's not an answer on my question. And don't top-post...
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:13:02 +0100
Richard Pijnenbur
On Fri, 25 Nov 2005 08:41:18 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> With sigtool -l I only see the Sober.U, not the Sober.Y
It's not an answer on my question. And don't top-post...
> Tomasz Kojm wrote:
> > On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:13:02 +0100
> > Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED
With sigtool -l I only see the Sober.U, not the Sober.Y
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:13:02 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I still haven't seen the Sober.Y version.
Which version do you mean by Sober.Y?
sigtool -l
---
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 at 15:13:02 +0100, Richard Pijnenburg wrote:
[...]
> someone wrote:
[...]
> >On tor, 2005-11-24 at 14:19 +0100, aCaB wrote:
> >>someone wrote:
[...]
> >>>
> >>___
> >>http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
> >_
Oscar Olmos wrote:
Hello:
I'm looking for ths Virus Sober.Y in the Clamav Database, but I cannot
find, Do you know if the Virus has another name?
I have received Email from the @fbi.org adresses and my Clamav don't
detected like a virus
My clamav version is 0.86.2-1
Thanks
NOTA: I'm sorry fo
On Thu, 24 Nov 2005 15:13:02 +0100
Richard Pijnenburg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I still haven't seen the Sober.Y version.
Which version do you mean by Sober.Y?
sigtool -l
--
oo. Tomasz Kojm <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(\/)\. http://www.ClamAV.net/gpg/tkojm.gpg
We currently get alot of Sober.U virus mails. There all getting stopped by
ClamAV.
I still haven't seen the Sober.Y version.
main.cvd is up to date (version: 34, sigs: 39625, f-level: 5, builder: tkojm)
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 1193, sigs: 1654, f-level: 6, builder: diego)
Rickard Vik
Hi
I need something to check my clamav installation.
but can you confirm that this cvd is correct for sober.{Y,U}:
main.cvd is up to date (version: 34, sigs: 39625, f-level: 5, builder:
tkojm)
daily.cvd is up to date (version: 1193, sigs: 1654, f-level: 6, builder:
diego)
On tor, 2005-11-24 at
Rickard Vikström wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is there a testmail with sober.{Y,U} ?
> So I can check my ClamAV installation.
>
This in *NOT* a Vx'ing ML.
___
http://lurker.clamav.net/list/clamav-users.html
Hi
Is there a testmail with sober.{Y,U} ?
So I can check my ClamAV installation.
On tor, 2005-11-24 at 13:52 +0100, Oscar Olmos wrote:
> Thanks Ralph
> I'm not sure about the name, my clamav detect Sober.U too
>
> El jue, 24-11-2005 a las 13:21 +0100, Ralph Angenendt escribió:
> > Oscar Olmos
Thanks Ralph
I'm not sure about the name, my clamav detect Sober.U too
El jue, 24-11-2005 a las 13:21 +0100, Ralph Angenendt escribió:
> Oscar Olmos wrote:
> > Hello:
> > I'm looking for ths Virus Sober.Y in the Clamav Database, but I cannot
> > find, Do you know if the Virus has another name?
> >
Oscar Olmos wrote:
> Hello:
> I'm looking for ths Virus Sober.Y in the Clamav Database, but I cannot
> find, Do you know if the Virus has another name?
> I have received Email from the @fbi.org adresses and my Clamav don't
> detected like a virus
The name's Sober.U - and my clamav installation (0.
Hello:
I'm looking for ths Virus Sober.Y in the Clamav Database, but I cannot
find, Do you know if the Virus has another name?
I have received Email from the @fbi.org adresses and my Clamav don't
detected like a virus
My clamav version is 0.86.2-1
Thanks
NOTA: I'm sorry for my English
18 matches
Mail list logo
