On Tue, 15 Jun 2004 23:30:34 +0200
Micha Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> and then exits without further checking. So I assume that clamdscan
> returns a 2 on finding a syntax error in the clamav.conf file?? So a
Yes, you're right.
> return value of 2 is not really an error, since clamdscan i
Tomasz Kojm wrote:
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:58:20 +0300
Micha Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I reverted back to using clamscan within the qmail-scanner.pl script
(causing higher CPU and memory usage) and went for help on the
qmail-scanner list. Today I finally hit on my problem: the clamav.conf
On Mon, 14 Jun 2004 16:58:20 +0300
Micha Silver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I reverted back to using clamscan within the qmail-scanner.pl script
> (causing higher CPU and memory usage) and went for help on the
> qmail-scanner list. Today I finally hit on my problem: the clamav.conf
>
> directi
I have been running clamav 0.70 from qmail-scanner-queue.pl for some
months now. This is on a Fedora Core 1 server. This week I got the
latest 0.72 version from Petr's crash-hat site using yum. I kept my
original clamav.conf file, and after the update, freshclam started OK,
as well as clamd.
Ho
