Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav virus signature update

2008-01-06 Thread Alessandro Volturno
Il giorno dom, 06/01/2008 alle 06.59 -0600, Dave M ha scritto: > ClamTk 3.06 should fix that. Usually that was happening when there > were two virus definition locations, from different installations, I'm > guessing. There were, infact, a version which I build from source code (another 0.92 vers

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav virus signature update

2008-01-06 Thread Dave M
On Jan 6, 2008 4:25 AM, Rob MacGregor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Jan 6, 2008 8:42 AM, Alessandro Volturno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello guys, > > > > I'm using Clamav 0.92 installed from the Debian Volatile repository. > > on a Debian testing distro kernel 2.6.22-3-686 kept daily update

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav virus signature update

2008-01-06 Thread Rob MacGregor
On Jan 6, 2008 8:42 AM, Alessandro Volturno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello guys, > > I'm using Clamav 0.92 installed from the Debian Volatile repository. > on a Debian testing distro kernel 2.6.22-3-686 kept daily updated. <---SNIP---> > Build: ClamAV 0.92/5385/Sun Jan 6 02:13:06 2008

[Clamav-users] Clamav virus signature update

2008-01-06 Thread Alessandro Volturno
Hello guys, I'm using Clamav 0.92 installed from the Debian Volatile repository. on a Debian testing distro kernel 2.6.22-3-686 kept daily updated. Running ClamTk I get the following message on a dialog box: Warning: Your virus signatures are 139 days old! When I run from the