RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-09 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Monday 09 Feb 2004 5:06 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > >> Feb 9 09:00:35 guardian clamav-milter[4661]: ClamAV version 'clamd / >> ClamAV version devel-20040204', clamav-milter version '0.66k' > > In that case clamav-milter has started and the

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-09 Thread Nigel Horne
On Monday 09 Feb 2004 5:06 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > Feb 9 09:00:35 guardian clamav-milter[4661]: ClamAV version 'clamd / > ClamAV version devel-20040204', clamav-milter version '0.66k' In that case clamav-milter has started and the issue is with sendmail. Have you changed sendmail.mc to

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-09 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Nigel Horne wrote: To me that sounds like something is wrong! ;-) >>> >>> Yes, but not terminally. >> >> So, does this message help to determine why nothing is being scanned? > > Have you turned LogSyslog on yet? If so, look in /var/log/messages > and/or /var/log

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-07 Thread Nigel Horne
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 7:07 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > Nigel Horne wrote: > > On Friday 06 Feb 2004 5:28 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > >> clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSysLog): warning - all interception message > >> methods are off > > > > Best to add LogSyslog in cl

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Friday 06 Feb 2004 5:28 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > >> clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSysLog): warning - all interception message >> methods are off > > Best to add LogSyslog in clamav.conf while you're testing. Actually > there's no reason not t

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Nigel Horne
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 5:28 pm, Michael St. Laurent wrote: > clamav-milter: (-q && !LogSysLog): warning - all interception message > methods are off Best to add LogSyslog in clamav.conf while you're testing. Actually there's no reason not to have that in permanently. > To me that sounds like some

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Nigel Horne wrote: > I can see nothing wrong here. So try this: enable debug and foreground > in clamav.conf. Restart clamav-milter by hand from the hash prompt (by > hand I mean not through a /etc/init.d script) and see if it shows up > any issues. > > I take it you're

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Nigel Horne
> Done. Nothing obvious at startup, but I'll monitor it and post anything > that looks useful. With these options we should see all errors printed to stderr. > Mike. -Nigel --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Confere

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Friday 06 Feb 2004 10:14 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>>What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? >> >>/usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq >>local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock >> >> >>>Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? >> >>UNIX s

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Nigel Horne
On Friday 06 Feb 2004 10:14 am, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? > > /usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq > local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock > > > Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? > > UNIX sockets. I can see nothing wro

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-06 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > What operating system? Linux - Debian Woody. > What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? /usr/sbin/clamav-milter --max-children=5 -olq local:/var/run/sendmail/milter/clamav.sock > Are you using UNIX or TCP socke

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Thu, 05 Feb 2004 19:38:26 +0100 Gianmarco Giovannelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Thu Feb 5 11:34:54 2004 -> Accepted connection on port 57892, fd 35 > Thu Feb 5 11:35:27 2004 -> Accepted connection on port 9254, fd 35 > Thu Feb 5 11:41:32 2004 -> Session 1 stopped due to timeout. > Thu Feb

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Gianmarco Giovannelli
At 05/02/2004, you wrote: Hi, I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful for me... Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this is an ongoing issue) with sendmail 8.12.10, a

RE: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Michael St. Laurent
Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Hi, > > I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm > repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately > painful for me... Me too. > Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this >

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > Have you set userprocesses in clamav.conf? > > No. First I've heard of it - what does it do? Not work. > Mike. -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. NJH Music, Barnsley, UK. ICQ#20252325 [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.b

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 4:15 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > No - clamdscan still works, or did last time I tested it. What operating system? What arguments are you giving to clamav-milter? Are you using UNIX or TCP sockets to talk to clamd? -Nigel -- Nigel Horne. Arranger, Composer, Typesetter. N

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Nigel Horne wrote: > On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > > >>I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm >>repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful >>for me... > > > Two other questions - has clamd died? No - clamdsc

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > Hi, > Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this is > an ongoing issue) with sendmail 8.12.10, and I get regular problems with > ClamAV spawning huge numbers of child processes, and generally falling > over. What o

Re: [Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Nigel Horne
On Thursday 05 Feb 2004 2:03 pm, Mike Brodbelt wrote: > I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm > repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful > for me... Two other questions - has clamd died? Have you set userprocesses in clamav.conf? -N

[Clamav-users] Clamav-milter runaway process problems

2004-02-05 Thread Mike Brodbelt
Hi, I've made the odd bit of noise about this on the list before, but I'm repeating myself because this particular problem is inordinately painful for me... Running Clamav and clamav-milter (now the 20040204 snapshot, but this is an ongoing issue) with sendmail 8.12.10, and I get regular problems