Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-19 Thread Clayton Keller
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 20:20, Rich Graves wrote: On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Clayton Keller wrote: It appears the issue is currently with Macintosh users trying to send .jpegs. Any known issues with the manner in which Photoshop maybe creating images. There does not appear to be any type of patch avail

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-18 Thread Trog
On Wed, 2004-11-17 at 20:20, Rich Graves wrote: > On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Clayton Keller wrote: > > > It appears the issue is currently with Macintosh users trying to send > > .jpegs. Any known issues with the manner in which Photoshop maybe > > creating images. There does not appear to be any type

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Rich Graves
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004, Clayton Keller wrote: > It appears the issue is currently with Macintosh users trying to send > .jpegs. Any known issues with the manner in which Photoshop maybe > creating images. There does not appear to be any type of patch available Yes: http://www.photo.net/bboard/q-

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Clayton Keller
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:12:26 -0600 Clayton Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have been doing some digging and have noticed from posts and changelogs issues pertaining to false positives of this exploit may have been taken care of during the RC phase of 0.80. The problem has been fixed in 0.80

Re: [Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Tomasz Kojm
On Wed, 17 Nov 2004 13:12:26 -0600 Clayton Keller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I have been doing some digging and have noticed from posts and > changelogs issues pertaining to false positives of this exploit may > have been taken care of during the RC phase of 0.80. The problem has been fixed in

[Clamav-users] ClamAV JPEG Exploit - False Positives

2004-11-17 Thread Clayton Keller
I have been doing some digging and have noticed from posts and changelogs issues pertaining to false positives of this exploit may have been taken care of during the RC phase of 0.80. I have had some messages brought to my attention that have been rejected due to the exploit that do not appear